HomeNewsTrendsEntertainmentPor review: Bejoy Nambiar’s film on student politics is all over the place
Trending Topics

Por review: Bejoy Nambiar’s film on student politics is all over the place

Por / Dange review: A film about student politics needs to be rooted. It needs cultural specificity. But Bejoy Nambiar treats Por like an action movie with an earnest “tick-the-box” wokeness that doesn’t explore anything with any seriousness.

March 03, 2024 / 11:30 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Bejoy Nambiar's Por / Dange review: The two men at the centre of the film are Prabhu (Arjun Das) and Yuva (Kalidas Jayaram). (Image via X/@dp_karthik)
Bejoy Nambiar's Por / Dange review: The two men at the centre of the film are Prabhu (Arjun Das) and Yuva (Kalidas Jayaram). (Image via X/@dp_karthik)

Bejoy Nambiar’s Por, shot simultaneously in Hindi as Dange with a different cast, is a film on campus politics. There are shades of his mentor Mani Ratnam’s Ayutha Ezhuthu, and one of the characters is even named ‘Yuva’ (the film’s Hindi title). But while the 2004 film was about a student organisation fighting corruption in politics, this is an updated, ‘woke’ version that tries to bring in several issues to the forefront.

Story continues below Advertisement

Por means ‘war’, and there are several wars being fought in St Martin’s University, located in Pondicherry – over power, love, betrayal and the past. The film opens with the war in full swing, and then goes back to tell us how it all began. The two men at the centre of the film are Prabhu (Arjun Das) and Yuva (Kalidas Jayaram). Prabhu has failed his viva four times, and messes it up for the fifth time because he has accidentally ingested hallucinogens. He’s best friends with Rishika (Sanchana Natarajan), who is the university’s drug supplier. Prabhu has a beard and likes to ride ATVs. That’s about it. We’re meant to find him cool but even Arjun Das’s distinct baritone doesn’t help us like the character.

Yuva is Prabhu’s junior and has a reputation for standing up to bullies. He monkeys around and is supposed to be charming – except, his lines are quite terrible and land flat. In fact, all the dialogues sound like they were written in English and translated to Tamil. The lines break oddly and you feel like you’re watching a badly dubbed film. It’s also strange that the students are supposed to be in college now but all their pop culture references belong to the '80s or '90s. I mean, why would a 20-something cite Idhayam (1991) Murali as an example of “one-side” love?