HomeNewsTechnologyFireside Ventures tasted success with Mamaearth IPO. Here’s its recipe for IPO-able startups

Fireside Ventures tasted success with Mamaearth IPO. Here’s its recipe for IPO-able startups

The VC firm invests in companies that will eventually get rewarded by public market investors. It puts in place a head of finance from the early days and head of people functions at its portfolio companies, said Dipanjan Basu, co-founder and partner.

December 27, 2023 / 11:42 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Dipanjan Basu, co-founder & partner, Fireside Ventures
Dipanjan Basu, co-founder & partner, Fireside Ventures

Fireside Ventures, the venture capital (VC) firm that backs consumer startups, reaped massive benefits from its investments in Mamaearth, the first-ever company to go for an initial public offering (IPO) from its portfolio. In total, Fireside invested around Rs 30 crore in Mamaearth and made over Rs 550 crore in returns as it diluted its stake for the offer-for-sale (OFS) component.

In another transaction, days later, it sold more shares and booked a massive 4,500 percent profit on its investment in Honasa Consumer, Mamaearth’s parent company. Fireside had paid Rs 7.33 for each share in Mamaearth, and the company’s share price closed the last trading session at Rs 436.15 apiece on December 26, signalling more upside for the VC firm as it still holds around 5 percent in Mamaearth.

Story continues below Advertisement

So, what worked for the Bengaluru-based investor? We caught up with Dipanjan Basu, co-founder and partner, Fireside Ventures, who said the VC firm identifies and invests in companies that align with what public market investors reward later. Fireside ensures portfolio companies have a head of finance/chief financial officer from the early days, the investor even employs a person within the VC firm who oversees people functions at its portfolio companies.

Speaking on the recent corporate governance lapses that have cropped up within the wider startup ecosystem, Basu said, “While the tactical answer is that there could have been financial fraud, the eventual answer is different.”