HomeNewsOpinionOPINION | Why RSS’ articulation of ‘Being Hindu’ and ‘Hindutva’ is a much-needed intervention

OPINION | Why RSS’ articulation of ‘Being Hindu’ and ‘Hindutva’ is a much-needed intervention

RSSFACTS: Mohan Bhagwat reiterates that “Hindu” refers to shared civilisational Dharma, not religion or worship, emphasising spirituality, inclusiveness and the universal, eternal nature of Sanatan Dharma

November 21, 2025 / 10:40 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
somnath mandir
“Being Hindu” is associated far more with spirituality than with politics or geography.

(RSSFACTS is a column that demystifies the functioning, organisational structure and ideology of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh.)

During a time when public discourse is increasingly saturated with shorthand narratives about Bharat’s culture and civilisational values, RSS Sarsanghchalak Mohan Bhagwat’s articulation of “Being Hindu” and “Hindutva” is a much-needed intervention to reset the debate in the right direction.
In several recent speeches, the RSS Sarsanghchalak has reiterated the organisation’s consistent position that anyone who considers Bharat to be his or her motherland is a Hindu, and that this has nothing to do with one’s way of worship. Bhagwat spoke about this at length during his interaction in Bengaluru on 8–9 November and again while addressing a gathering in Guwahati.

Story continues below Advertisement

Who is a Hindu?

To understand the RSS’ stand on this issue, one needs to go back well before 1925, when the organisation was founded. There is a general misconception that “Hindutva”, “Hinduness”, or “Hindu nationalism” is a recent phenomenon, but a deeper look into the past provides the right perspective.
There have been many definitions of the term “Hindu”, but the most commonly accepted one is that it denoted a civilisation carrying certain cultural values embedded in the concept of “Dharma”. There is no true equivalent in English for “Dharma”; the closest is perhaps “righteousness”. Much misunderstanding about “Hindu Dharma” arises from the misinterpretation of “Dharma” as “religion”.