Moneycontrol

India’s international development assistance programmes need revisiting

Development cooperation has clearly become a significant aspect of Indian foreign policy discourse and strategic thinking. In the last two decades, lines of credits worth more than $25 billion have been provided to about 60 developing countries

August 03, 2020 / 15:32 IST
Story continues below Advertisement

On July 30, while inaugurating new Supreme Court building built by India in Mauritius, Prime Minister Narendra Modi outlined Indian approach towards development assistance abroad. He asserted that the fundamental principle of Indian development cooperation is ‘respecting our partners’. He also stressed that Indian policy is ‘human centric’, free of conditions, and ‘not influenced by political and commercial considerations’. He mentioned few other Indian projects in Afghanistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Maldives, Guyana and Niger.

Although most countries do exaggerate developmental and humanitarian objectives of their foreign aid, Indian experiences is relatively unique. For decades, India struggled against the concept of ‘donor-recipient’ at multilateral forums. It believed that rich northern countries had an ‘obligation’ rather than a voluntary ‘charitable’ reason to assist development efforts in their former colonies. In its earlier development phase, India itself relied on significant foreign aid. Its own experience as a recipient of aid has deeply influenced India’s approach to its own development cooperation programmes.

Story continues below Advertisement

With its own growth story unfolding, India is increasing sharing its experiences and even resources with other developing nations. Indian policy makers prefer to call these activities ‘development partnerships,’ rather than aid provided by ‘new donors’ or ‘emerging donors’.

Over the years, activities appeared officially within the framework of South-South Cooperation (SSC). The SSC idea emerged as a principle of solidarity among developing countries. India played an important role in its development within the Non-Aligned movement (NAM), Group of 77 (G77), and the UN system, particularly in the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).