HomeNewsBusinessEbix plans countersuit against Yatra as merger fight intensifies
Trending Topics

Ebix plans countersuit against Yatra as merger fight intensifies

The Ebix response followed Yatra Online’s announcement on June 6 that it had terminated a pending merger agreement with Ebix and opted for litigation seeking ‘substantial damages’ over alleged breach of deal terms

June 09, 2020 / 14:56 IST
Story continues below Advertisement

Ebix has hit back after Yatra Online decided to terminate the $337 million merger agreement between both parties in a sudden move that rocked the travel services industry. In an official statement, the Atlanta headquartered firm said it “intends to enforce all of its rights under the merger agreement and is currently considering all options, including a countersuit against Yatra, on account of multiple breaches of the merger agreement.”

The Ebix response followed Yatra Online’s announcement on June 6 that it had terminated a pending merger agreement with Ebix and opted for litigation seeking ‘substantial damages’ over alleged breach of deal terms. The aggressive stance of both parties has set the stage for fireworks in court at a time when the novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, pandemic has hit mergers and acquisitions (M&A).

Story continues below Advertisement

The Ebix statement said that the firm “worked diligently to fulfil its obligations under the merger agreement and thus strongly disagrees with the allegations set forth in the complaint,” adding that both parties had agreed to extend the deadline for the merger agreement to June 4 to mutually agree on changes to certain terms of the transaction.

“On May 14, Yatra Online entered into an agreement with Ebix, extending the outside date of the merger agreement dated July 16, 2019, by and between Yatra, Ebix and EbixCash Travels, a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Ebix, to June 4. The merger agreement contained certain termination rights for Ebix and Yatra, including, among others, the right of either party to terminate the merger agreement if the merger has not been consummated on or prior to the outside date. The outside date was extended to June 4 in order to provide the parties with time to determine whether they could reach mutual agreement on an amendment of certain terms of the merger agreement.