HomeNewsBusinessCryptocurrencyCrypto's ties to sports raise ethical questions
Trending Topics

Crypto's ties to sports raise ethical questions

The bankruptcy of FTX and the arrest of its founder and former CEO are raising new questions about the role celebrity athletes such as Tom Brady, Steph Curry, Naomi Osaka and others played in lending legitimacy to the largely unregulated landscape of crypto, while also reframing the conversation about just how costly blind loyalty to favorite players or teams can be for the average fan.

December 17, 2022 / 19:52 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Government rules state that events such as crypto transfer or withdrawal from one’s wallet and putting it in that of another are taxable (Representative Image)
Government rules state that events such as crypto transfer or withdrawal from one’s wallet and putting it in that of another are taxable (Representative Image)

Sports fans who view their favorite players as role models might think twice before taking their financial advice, too.

The bankruptcy of FTX and the arrest of its founder and former CEO are raising new questions about the role celebrity athletes such as Tom Brady, Steph Curry, Naomi Osaka and others played in lending legitimacy to the largely unregulated landscape of crypto, while also reframing the conversation about just how costly blind loyalty to favorite players or teams can be for the average fan.

Story continues below Advertisement

Cryptocurrencies are digital money that use blockchain as the database for recording transactions. It isn’t backed by any government or institution and it remains a confusing concept — one that at first was largely the niche of tech-savvy coding specialists, people who distrusted governments and centralized banking systems and speculators with money to risk.

But now that risk is increasingly being taken on by investors who can’t afford to lose, and the disparity in wealth between celebrities and their fans creates an ethical dilemma: Should sports stars, or teams, or leagues, be touting products that could lead their fans to financial harm? Or should fans bear the responsibility for their own risky behavior regardless of who is encouraging it?