HomeEntertainmentMoviesJackie Shroff files a case in Delhi High Court against firms for using word 'Bhidu' without his consent
Trending Topics

Jackie Shroff files a case in Delhi High Court against firms for using word 'Bhidu' without his consent

Renowned Bollywood actor Jackie Shroff filed a lawsuit in the Delhi High Court, aiming to prohibit numerous companies and social media platforms from utilizing his identity, image, voice, and notably, his well-known nickname 'Bhidu,' without prior consent.

May 14, 2024 / 14:40 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
The term "Bhidu," affectionately linked with Jackie Shroff, means "friend" in Mumbai's slang, embodying Shroff's identity both in movies and real life.
The term "Bhidu," affectionately linked with Jackie Shroff, means "friend" in Mumbai's slang, embodying Shroff's identity both in movies and real life.

Veteran Bollywood actor Jackie Shroff has recently taken legal action to protect his personality rights, highlighting the often overlooked issue of 'unauthorized' commercial use of a public figure’s attributes. Jackie Shroff filed a case in the Delhi High Court, seeking to restrain various firms and social media channels from using his name, likeness, voice, and notably, his popular nickname 'Bhidu,' without his consent.

'Bhidu,' a term fondly associated with Jackie Shroff, translates to "friend" in Mumbai’s colloquial language and has become synonymous with Shroff's persona, both on-screen and off. This nickname is not just a moniker but a significant part of his identity, endearing him to millions of fans. The unauthorized use of this term, along with his images and voice in memes and advertisements, prompted Shroff to take legal measures to safeguard his personal brand and identity.

Story continues below Advertisement

The misuse of celebrity attributes isn't new in the digital age, where images and videos can be widely disseminated across various platforms without proper authorization. For celebrities like Shroff, such unauthorized use can lead to a dilution of their personal brand and, in some cases, might be employed in a context that misrepresents or harms their public image.

In his legal battle, Shroff's advocate, Pravin Anand, informed the court about various instances where Shroff’s images and voice were misappropriated, often used in offensive memes or unauthorized advertisements.