HomeEntertainmentKoreanKim Sae Ron’s family shares alleged texts with Kim Soo Hyun; actor calls them fake and 'deliberately manipulated': Report

Kim Sae Ron’s family shares alleged texts with Kim Soo Hyun; actor calls them fake and 'deliberately manipulated': Report

The family of late actress Kim Sae-ron has released alleged text messages claiming she had a romantic relationship with actor Kim Soo-hyun while still underage. Kim’s team denies all accusations, calling the messages fabricated and maliciously edited.

October 14, 2025 / 13:43 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Kim Sae Ron’s family shares alleged texts with Kim Soo Hyun; actor calls them fake and 'deliberately manipulated': Report
Kim Sae Ron’s family shares alleged texts with Kim Soo Hyun; actor calls them fake and 'deliberately manipulated': Report

In a fresh turn to a long-running controversy, the family of the late actress Kim Sae-ron has released a cache of text messages they claim prove she was romantically involved with actor Kim Soo-hyun while still a minor. The actor and his legal team have firmly denied the allegations, calling the messages false and deliberately manipulated.

According to reports of Reuters, the texts date back to 2015–2016, when Sae-ron was still underage and Kim Soo-hyun in his late twenties. The messages reportedly include romantic phrases such as “Give me a kiss later,” “Is this forbidden too?”, and “When can I hold you and fall asleep? I think I’d be able to sleep really well then.” The family also claims the messages arrange meetings and suggest an intimate relationship.

Story continues below Advertisement

The timing of the texts is key to their case. On October 13, multiple Korean media outlets pointed out that the dates in those messages overlap with the filming schedule for Kim Soo-hyun’s movie Real. One statement from the Real staff circulated among Korean media says the actor was heavily occupied on set, often exhausted, leaving “absolutely no time to wait around for anyone.”

Kim Soo-hyun and his legal team issued a statement the same day, asserting the texts are not evidence that he was the sender. They argue the conversations are vague, lacking any identifiers or contextual clues about time, place, or activity. They further suggest that the sender’s real identity has been intentionally obscured.