When the 1965 India-Pakistan war widened in early September, the skies over Punjab became as contested as the ground below. The Pakistan Air Force launched strikes against forward Indian air bases, aiming to blunt India’s ability to support its ground offensive. Two of the most important targets were Halwara and Pathankot.
The plan was straightforward. If you disable an opponent’s airfields, you reduce their ability to launch counter strikes, provide close air support, and defend their own cities. What unfolded, however, showed that knocking out an air base is far harder than hitting it once.
Why Halwara and Pathankot mattered
Halwara, near Ludhiana, and Pathankot, close to the border in Punjab, were crucial forward operating bases for the Indian Air Force. From these runways, fighter squadrons could respond quickly to incursions and support the army’s operations in Punjab and Jammu.
The Hindu and Indian Express retrospectives on 1965 have repeatedly described the opening air attacks as an attempt by Pakistan to gain early air advantage. The Pakistan Air Force fielded American supplied F-86 Sabres and F-104 Starfighters, aircraft that were widely regarded at the time as technologically advanced.
India’s frontline fighters included the Gnat, the Mystere and the Hunter. The Gnat in particular would go on to earn a reputation as a “Sabre slayer” during the conflict.
The attack on Pathankot
On 6 September 1965, the Pakistan Air Force struck Pathankot in a surprise raid. According to official Indian accounts and later reporting in Times of India and The Print, several Indian aircraft were destroyed on the ground during the initial strike.
The damage was serious. Aircraft caught parked in the open were vulnerable. For a brief moment, it appeared that Pakistan had achieved tactical surprise.
But the base was not rendered unusable. Runways were repaired quickly, dispersal procedures were tightened, and sorties resumed. The ability to absorb the blow and restore operational capability prevented the strike from achieving its broader objective.
Halwara under fire
Halwara faced repeated pressure in the days that followed. Pakistani aircraft attempted to strike the base and draw Indian fighters into combat.
What followed over Halwara were some of the most intense dogfights of the war. Indian Air Force Gnats and Hunters intercepted incoming aircraft. Multiple engagements resulted in Pakistani Sabres being shot down.
Indian Air Force records and coverage in Indian Express and The Hindu recount how the Gnat earned its reputation during these clashes. Small, agile and difficult to spot, it proved highly effective in close combat despite earlier scepticism about its performance.
The defence of Halwara became symbolic. Rather than being suppressed, the base continued launching missions, demonstrating that air superiority could not be claimed easily.
Air combat and resilience
Air warfare is not only about aircraft. It is about maintenance crews, radar operators, runway repair teams and air defence guns.
At both Halwara and Pathankot, ground crews worked under threat to keep aircraft serviceable. Damaged runways were patched. Aircraft were dispersed more widely after initial lessons. Anti aircraft defences were reinforced.
The ability to recover quickly limited the strategic impact of the initial Pakistani raids. As The Print has noted in its coverage of the 1965 air war, neither side managed to completely neutralise the other’s air force in the opening phase.
Instead, the air war evolved into a series of raids, counter raids and dogfights across the western front.
The larger air campaign
While Halwara and Pathankot were high profile targets, the 1965 air war stretched from Kashmir to Rajasthan. Both sides claimed aerial victories. Both lost aircraft.
Indian accounts highlight the performance of pilots who shot down Sabres and defended forward bases. Pakistani narratives emphasise their own strikes and interceptions.
What remains consistent is that the air campaign did not produce decisive dominance for either side. It remained contested.
What holding meant
When historians say Halwara and Pathankot “held under pressure,” they do not mean they were untouched. Pathankot suffered aircraft losses. Both bases faced repeated attacks.
What they mean is that the bases continued functioning.
Runways were not permanently cratered. Squadrons were not forced to relocate en masse. The Indian Air Force maintained its ability to support ground operations in Punjab and Jammu.
That mattered deeply at a time when India had launched its largest armoured thrust in the Sialkot sector. Air cover and interdiction support were essential components of that effort.
The lessons of 1965
The air war over Halwara and Pathankot reinforced several lessons. First, surprise strikes can cause damage but do not automatically achieve lasting advantage. Second, dispersal, hardened shelters and rapid repair capabilities are crucial. Third, pilot training and aircraft handling often matter more than paper specifications.
The Gnat’s performance against the Sabre reshaped perceptions within the Indian Air Force. The early vulnerability at Pathankot underscored the need for better protective measures at forward bases.
In the broader arc of the 1965 war, the defence of Halwara and the recovery of Pathankot prevented Pakistan from seizing early control of the skies over Punjab. The bases absorbed the shock and kept flying.
In a war where neither side achieved outright air supremacy, simply holding the line from the runway up became a quiet but decisive achievement.
Discover the latest Business News, Sensex, and Nifty updates. Obtain Personal Finance insights, tax queries, and expert opinions on Moneycontrol or download the Moneycontrol App to stay updated!
