Wimbledon 2025 was meant to herald a new age of unerring accuracy with its full adoption of electronic line-calling, replacing the venerable human line judges. Yet, just days into the Championships, the hallowed lawns of SW19 have become an unfortunate stage for a series of blunders, prompting frustrated players to term points "stolen" and raising serious questions about the supposed infallibility of technology.
The most glaring incident unfolded on Centre Court during the fourth-round clash between Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova and Sonay Kartal. At a pivotal moment in the match, with Pavlyuchenkova holding game point, a shot from Kartal landed visibly long. However, to the bewilderment of players and crowd alike, no "out" call came from the automated system. It was later revealed by the All England Club that the system had been "inadvertently deactivated" by an "operator error" for three crucial points, allowing the glaring mistake to occur.
Wimbledon: Novak Djokovic happy to lift the Roger Federer ‘curse’
Pavlyuchenkova’s fury was palpable, immediately confronting umpire Nico Helwerth with the accusation: "They stole the game from me!" The point was ultimately replayed, a decision that did little to quell the Russian's anger or the broader unease about the integrity of the technology.
Adding a peculiar twist to the narrative, umpire Helwerth, who found himself at the epicentre of the storm, was conspicuously absent from the match schedule the following day. The All England Club swiftly clarified that his absence was a pre-scheduled "rest day", asserting that he had "acted entirely correctly" within the established protocols for a system malfunction. However, the timing of his "rest" only fuelled speculation amidst the swirling controversy.
This incident wasn't isolated. Other players, including British hopefuls Emma Raducanu and Jack Draper, have voiced concerns about the accuracy of the electronic system, even prior to the Centre Court debacle. Following her loss to Aryna Sabalenka, Emma Raducanu expressed her frustration: "That call was for sure out. It's kind of disappointing, the tournament here, that the calls can be so wrong, but for the most part they've been OK. I've had a few in my other matches, too, that have been very wrong. Hopefully they can fix that."
Also Read | Virat Kohli talks about bond with Novak Djokovic: ‘Exchanged messages, stayed in touch’
Similarly, Jack Draper, after his second-round exit, cast doubt on the system's absolute precision. "I don't think it's 100 percent accurate, in all honesty," he remarked. Draper further elaborated on his concerns, adding: "A couple of the ones today it showed a mark on the court. There's no way the chalk would have showed."
While Wimbledon officials maintain "full confidence" in the technology, the admission of "human error" in deactivating the system – and a subsequent "malfunction" in a later quarter-final between Taylor Fritz and Karen Khachanov (attributed to a ball boy crossing the net at the wrong time) – serves as a stark reminder that even the most advanced systems remain vulnerable to human oversight or unpredictable glitches.
As the tournament progresses, the debate intensifies: is the pursuit of technological perfection coming at the cost of the sport's spirit and, more importantly, fair play? Wimbledon's commitment to electronic line-calling is clear, but the early days of 2025 have undoubtedly cast a shadow of doubt over its seamless integration. The All England Club has announced immediate changes to prevent a recurrence of manual deactivation, but the echoes of "stolen points" and the uncomfortable notion of an umpire on "rest" will undoubtedly linger.
Discover the latest Business News, Sensex, and Nifty updates. Obtain Personal Finance insights, tax queries, and expert opinions on Moneycontrol or download the Moneycontrol App to stay updated!
