HomeNewsWorldIPL founder Lalit Modi now faces defamation case in Singapore High Court

IPL founder Lalit Modi now faces defamation case in Singapore High Court

According to the plaintiffs' lawyer, the case "concerns various social media posts of Lalit Modi which contain serious allegations against our clients. These allegations include factually incorrect narratives about various issues pertaining to the English litigation between Blu and Lalit Modi".

November 03, 2023 / 11:24 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
The law firm representing Gurpreet 'Blu' Gill Maag (right) and her husband, Daniel Maag, has confirmed that the Singapore-based couple have filed a defamation case against Lalit Modi.
The law firm representing Gurpreet 'Blu' Gill Maag (right) and her husband, Daniel Maag, has confirmed that the Singapore-based couple have filed a defamation case against Lalit Modi (left).

Former model and angel investor Gurpreet 'Blu' Gill Maag and her husband, Daniel Maag, an investment banker, this month filed a defamation case against Lalit Modi in the Singapore High Court. The defamation case pertains to social media posts by Modi, the founder of the Indian Premier League (IPL), who is now based in London.

The Singapore-based couple had earlier waged a legal battle in the High Court in London against Lalit Modi relating to a $1 million investment their company, Quantum Care, had made in a start-up venture Ion Care in November 2018 - barely seven months after the couple had a chance meeting with Modi in Dubai's Four Seasons Hotel. The start-up was the brainchild of Modi and envisaged establishment of specialist cancer treatment centres across the world.

Story continues below Advertisement

The Maags claimed that Modi knowingly made misleading or false claims that celebrities and influential individuals ranging from the royal families of Spain and Abu Dhabi to Kofi Annan, Sharad Pawar, Cristiano Ronaldo, Naomi Campbell and various others were involved in the Ion Care project as patrons and investors.

However, Judge Murray Rosen in March 2022 observed that Modi had not made "actionable misrepresentations" and in the judgment said that it was a "heavy burden in seeking to establish a difficult case in deceit". However, he directed Modi to pay the balance of $800,000 that was owed to the couple by Modi. The couple then filed an appeal which was dismissed by the Court of Appeal in February 2023.