Moneycontrol
HomeNewsTrendsLegalSC’s order on unstamped agreements will have positive impact on dispute resolution: Experts
Trending Topics

SC’s order on unstamped agreements will have positive impact on dispute resolution: Experts

The seven-judge bench overturned a previous judgement to rule that unstamped or partially stamped arbitration agreements are enforceable by law. This decision has removed the ambiguity surrounding stamping of arbitration agreements.

December 15, 2023 / 17:08 IST
Story continues below Advertisement

SC's ruling on unstamped arbitration agreements

Arbitration lawyers say that the decision of the seven-judge bench of the Supreme Court on holding that unstamped arbitration agreements are legally enforceable will have a positive impact on dispute resolution going forward.

Tejas Karia, Partner and Head-Arbitration at Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas and Co said “This is a welcome decision as it clarified the anomaly by quickly overruling N N Global (five-judge bench’s judgement) decision and holding that unstamped or insufficiently stamped arbitration agreements are not void or unenforceable.” He noted that the judgement will enhance the image of the Supreme Court globally for being progressive and pro-arbitration.

Story continues below Advertisement

According to Karia, the decision will have a positive impact on quicker and more efficient resolution of disputes by arbitration. The decision will provide the much-needed impetus to the Indian arbitration framework.

On December 13, a seven-judge bench of the Supreme Court unanimously held that unstamped arbitration agreements are legally enforceable. The court has held that it is for the arbitrator to look at the adequacy of stamp duty paid for an agreement. The apex court overruled the judgment of a five-judge bench, which had in April 2023 held that unstamped arbitration agreements were not legally enforceable. The court has held that holding an arbitration agreement to be unenforceable based on stamping at the initial stage of the arbitral proceedings is against the rationale of the law.