Moneycontrol
HomeNewsOpinionWhy ULFA(I)’s unilateral ceasefire is unlikely to lead to talks

Why ULFA(I)’s unilateral ceasefire is unlikely to lead to talks

Given the circumstances, it is doubtful if the ceasefire would lead to a peace process between the two sides. It is difficult to envisage Paresh Baruah’s arrival in New Delhi from Yunnan to participate in the peace process with the approval of his Chinese handlers

May 20, 2021 / 12:08 IST
Story continues below Advertisement

A file photo of ULFA(I) chief of staff Paresh Baruah. Photo credit: Rajeev Bhattacharyya

On May 15, the anti-talks faction of United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA(I)) led by chief of staff Paresh Baruah sprang a surprise by declaring a unilateral ceasefire with the government for three months. The reason cited in a release was the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic which prompted the banned outfit to temporary call off its campaign for an independent Assam. The decision came barely a week after Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma renewed an appeal to the outfit to engage in talks for a negotiated settlement.

Since it emerged in the early 1980s, this is ULFA’s third ceasefire — the first was in 1991 within weeks after Operation Bajrang was launched, and the second in 2006 after the Manmohan Singh government despatched a letter to chairman Arabinda Rajkhowa agreeing to discuss all ‘core issues’. Both the initiatives for a negotiated settlement failed owing to the opposition from the hardline faction led by Baruah.

Story continues below Advertisement

So, what motivated Baruah to declare a unilateral ceasefire this time around?

The faction he heads is estimated to have a strength of less than 200 cadre, most of whom are based in the Naga inhabited zone in Myanmar. Its capability to continue the campaign has been diminishing since the split in 2010-11 when another faction led by Rajkhowa began talks with the government.