HomeNewsOpinionTwo oil deals lay bare the OPEC+ problem

Two oil deals lay bare the OPEC+ problem

While the oil exporters’ club is focused on influencing prices, other actors are working to reduce their exposure to them

June 11, 2024 / 16:01 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
OPEC
OPEC+ remains in the price management business.

OPEC+ is mystified that the oil market somehow misread the latest tweaks to its lattice of oil production targets, carve outs and claw-backs that now have all the clarity of a tax form. Brent crude hiccupped after the oil exporters’ club met and indicated it wants to unwind some output cuts. That prompted several ministers to chide bearish analysts and reporters,
and reiterate the group’s stabilizing effect — from the stage at an economic conference in Russia, the de facto co-head of OPEC+ currently engaged in a less-than-stabilizing invasion of its neighbor. Oil prices ticked up a bit.

The likes of Saudi Arabian Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman seem to be focused on a distraction, perhaps even whistling past the graveyard. Two transactions show why. A few days before OPEC+ met, ConocoPhillips, the largest US exploration and production company, announced a $23 billion deal, including assumed debt, to acquire Marathon Oil Corp. A day later, Riyadh announced a secondary offering of shares in Saudi Arabian Oil Co., or Saudi Aramco, which raised just over $11 billion.

Conoco’s deal continues the consolidation of the fragmented US onshore oil and gas sector. Back in 2019, Conoco Chief Executive Ryan Lance delivered a reality check, pointing out that, despite the vaunted success of the shale boom, the excessive spending involved had trashed the industry’s returns. Investors burned by this and mindful of climate change concerns would no longer pay up for the oil option embedded in E&P stocks, either. Rather than exuberance, they demanded resilience exemplified by scale, efficiency and cash payouts.

Story continues below Advertisement

It worked. Between the end of 2019 and the end of 2023, the E&P sector’s average net debt fell from 3.7 times Ebitda to 1.2 times and aggregate free annual cash flow jumped from $6.2 billion to $33.1 billion. Energy stocks’ total return bested the S&P 500 by 10 percentage points. Consolidation played a big part by bolstering balance sheets, cutting overhead and marrying up adjacent acreage for more efficient drilling. The collective share of US shale resources controlled by just the integrated oil majors plus Conoco jumped from 14% in 2019 to 25% today, according to Rystad Energy. In shale’s Permian basin heartland, just six firms now control 62% of the remaining resources.

A decade or so ago, at the height of oil’s first shale boom, the ungainly portmanteau “manufracturing” was thrown around; the idea being that, with shale’s resources unlocked, oil producers were less about risky
wildcatting and more about dependably fracking wells the way a factory stamps out parts. It was aspirational then given the industry’s financial incontinence but is closer to where the likes of Conoco are taking things now, focused on sweating rigs and fracking crews efficiently across a bigger, diversified set of resources rather than adding and dropping them as oil prices swing.