Policy | Uday 2.0 – Will it make the end consumer more powerful?

To understand the inherent contradiction between surplus power and poor supply, one has to decipher the electricity value chain, which is a delicately stacked pack of cards where all stakeholders are precariously balanced.

At the root of the challenge to achieve universal electrification is the inability of the discoms (distribution companies) to maintain power grids and equipment, which impairs their ability to supply surplus electricity. What has complicated the matter is the refusal of states to increase their power bills, which means discoms are dis-inclined to buy more power resulting in frequent outages and blackouts.

Then, there is considerable free power doled out to farmers for irrigation, an elephant in the room that nobody wants to discuss since it has a direct impact on vote banks.

In November 2015, the government had launched the ambitious scheme, Ujwal Discom Assurance Yojana (UDAY), to alleviate the financial health and operational efficiency of India’s debt-ridden discoms. A few years down the road, the progress has been patchy and is found wanting on many counts.

Highlights of the New Tariff Policy

Given this shaky state of affairs, let’s look at some key proposals of the policy which intends to improve the quality of service for the end consumer.

• Choice of energy supplier – The consumer will now have a choice of energy supplier and will be able to migrate or switch between suppliers based on the quality and cost at which the services are provided.


• Penalty for load shedding – The new policy aims to bring about discipline in the manner in which load shedding is carried out and discoms shall be penalised for any arbitrary load shedding and money credited to the consumer’s account.


• Major disruptions – All major disruptions including outages in transformers and the like will have to be attended to by discoms in a time-bound manner.


• Energy inefficiency – Discoms can no longer pass the inefficiency which inter alia stems from their operations onto consumers. This has now been capped at a maximum of 15 percent, which effectively limits any fee revision.

UDAY 1.0 was formulated with a two-pronged strategy of augmenting financial health and operational efficiencies of discoms. Under the scheme, discoms could convert debt into state government bonds by fulfilling certain conditions, including reducing power and interest costs, monitoring and reducing transmission losses and power theft, and fix faulty meters.

One major condition was reduction in AT&C (Aggregate Technical & Commercial) losses, which is a combination of technical loss, theft, inefficiency in billing, commercial loss because of defaults and collection issues.

In spite of the incentives under UDAY 1.0, discoms have not been able to bridge the gap between average cost of supply (ACS) and average revenue realised (ARR), resulting in deep losses. This is mainly an inter-play of several factors, including rapid electrification post UDAY 1.0, populist measures by most states that provide free electricity and availability of meters, among others.

With UDAY 2.0, the government plans to build a dis-incentive in the form of denying loans and grants to discoms that do not set their house in order and reduce losses. Opening letters of credit to ensure payment to power generating companies (gencos) has also been made mandatory to ensure payments.

While these measures are welcome to tackle the mess that discoms find themselves in, it is also important for the government to take a long-term view of the challenges while implementing UDAY 2.0.

Foremost is the absence of long-term power purchase agreements that would otherwise ensure stability between supply and demand. The government will also have to address the challenges of providing free power and the financial stress, which only adds to discoms’ worries.

Hopefully, UDAY 2.0 is the much-needed stick amid all the carrots that may help reform discoms and empower consumers.

Rajesh Sivaswamy is a Senior Partner, King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates and Attorneys. Views are personal.