Moneycontrol
HomeNewsIndiaPNB fraud case: UK High Court denies bail to Nirav Modi, marks 10th failed attempt
Trending Topics

PNB fraud case: UK High Court denies bail to Nirav Modi, marks 10th failed attempt

In an official post on X (formerly Twitter), the Enforcement Directorate (ED), Government of India, stated: “The UK High Court has once again refused to grant bail to Nirav Modi, the mastermind of the USD 1 billion fraud against PNB, while hearing his fourth bail application on Thursday, 15/05/2025.”

May 19, 2025 / 16:07 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Nirav Modi

The UK High Court has denied bail to Nirav Modi, the main accused in the USD 1 billion Punjab National Bank fraud case, rejecting his latest application during a hearing on Thursday, May 15. This marks the tenth failed attempt by Modi to secure bail since his detention in 2019, reported news agency ANI.

In an official post on X (formerly Twitter), the Enforcement Directorate (ED), Government of India, stated: “The UK High Court has once again refused to grant bail to Nirav Modi, the mastermind of the USD 1 billion fraud against PNB, while hearing his fourth bail application on Thursday, 15/05/2025.”

Story continues below Advertisement

The post continued, “After detailed deliberations on the arguments of the defence (Nirav Modi) and counter arguments of the prosecution (Government of India), written submissions by the ED (which highlighted the money laundering aspects of laundering of proceeds through shell companies to external jurisdictions including the UK) and considering the extent of fraud (part of which has already been attached/confiscated by the ED and returned to the victim banks), the UK High Court dismissed the application and refused to grant bail to Nirav Modi.”

Earlier this week, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) also issued a press release confirming the court’s decision. “Fresh Bail Petition filed by Nirav Deepak Modi was rejected by the High Court of Justice, King’s Bench Division, London. The bail arguments were strongly opposed by the Crown Prosecution Service advocate who was ably assisted by a strong CBI team consisting of investigating and law officers who travelled to London for this purpose.”