Moneycontrol
HomeNewsIndiaFormer CJI BR Gavai defends collegium system, says fair criticism of judgements always welcome

Former CJI BR Gavai defends collegium system, says fair criticism of judgements always welcome

Justice Gavai also talked about almost all critical issues including the shoe throwing incident, pendency, criticism of his verdicts on Presidential reference, his controversial views on exclusion of creamy layers amongst Scheduled Castes from quota benefits, and under representation of women in higher judiciary.

November 26, 2025 / 16:22 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
BR Gavai

Former Chief Justice of India B R Gavai on Tuesday strongly defended the collegium system for appointing judges and said the judiciary is always welcome to fair criticism of judgments.

Speaking to ANI, Gavai said attacking the judiciary without merely for political mileage is extremely wrong. "This is wrong. Judges act according to their perception, according to law and as per the facts before them. Fair criticism of the judgment is always welcome. But criticising the judges for their judgments is not in good taste," said the former CJI responding to a a question on attack by the Opposition on judiciary and constitutional bodies.

Story continues below Advertisement

Asked to comment on allegations against Justice Yashwant Varma, the CJI remarked: "It was an unfortunate incident. It is wrong to deny that it has affected the image of the judiciary. But now the matter is pending before the Parliament and the impeachment proceedings are already initiated. The inquiry, headed by a sitting judge of this court, is inquiring into the matter. Therefore, as a matter of propriety, it will not be proper for me to comment..."

Justice Gavai also talked about almost all critical issues including the shoe throwing incident, pendency, criticism of his verdicts on Presidential reference, his controversial views on exclusion of creamy layers amongst Scheduled Castes from quota benefits, and under representation of women in higher judiciary.