HomeNewsBusinessTech must drive cost efficiency in banking, moving beyond subsidies, says Sukand Ramachandran of BCG

Tech must drive cost efficiency in banking, moving beyond subsidies, says Sukand Ramachandran of BCG

In an exclusive interview to Moneyconytrol, Sukand Ramachandran, Managing Director and Senior Partner, BCG explains why payments need to be self-sustaining business not dependent on incentives.

August 20, 2024 / 17:14 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Sukand Ramachandran, Managing Director and Senior Partner, BCG
Sukand Ramachandran, Managing Director and Senior Partner, BCG

In an exclusive interview with Moneycontrol, Sukand Ramachandran, Managing Director and Senior Partner at BCG, discusses the importance of making payments a self-sustaining business rather than one reliant on incentives. Elaborating on why India is lagging behind its counterparts, globally on technology spending, he says India will increase the tech spending over time due to reasons of scale, demand from customers and shrinking boundaries of operations.

Banks in India frequently argue that there is insufficient incentive to invest heavily in technology, as these investments have not yet yielded tangible returns. Do you see these as real constraints?

Story continues below Advertisement

International banks often spend tech just to get the balance right between the cost of human capital versus the cost of technology. The US isn’t just one market. There are about 3,500 regional banks and community banks. There are 300 million people eligible for accounts, and even if you assume they have two accounts, that's 600 million accounts. State Bank of India caters to more than that. When you're operating at that scale, you can’t handle that with human labour only. There is a need for technology. India is leapfrogging on payments. There is an expectation set in a whole bunch of commercial transactions. From an international perspective, India inherently thinks about resilience.

Technology is complex. It is not always in-house, from a corporate point of view. You can borrow capability if it’s temporal. But if it is ephemeral and persistent, you need to have the capability in-house.