Moneycontrol
HomeNewsBusinessMCLR more effective in policy transmission than base rate regime: RBI paper
Trending Topics

MCLR more effective in policy transmission than base rate regime: RBI paper

The paper said that for every 1 percentage point increase by the RBI in its repo rate, the weighted average lending rate by banks for fresh rupee loans moves up by 0.26-0.47 per cent per cent under the MCLR regime as against 0.11-0.19 per cent under the base rate regime.

August 12, 2022 / 21:01 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Representative image. (PC-Shutterstock)

The newer marginal cost of funding based lending rate (MCLR) system is more effective than the erstwhile base rate method, a paper by the Reserve Bank of India said on Friday.

The paper said that for every 1 percentage point increase by the RBI in its repo rate, the weighted average lending rate by banks for fresh rupee loans moves up by 0.26-0.47 per cent per cent under the MCLR regime as against 0.11-0.19 per cent under the base rate regime.

Story continues below Advertisement

"...transmission is higher during the MCLR regime than base rate regime," the paper authored by Sadhan Kumar Chattopadhyay and Arghya Kusum Mitra said. Using different models, the paper estimates the degree of pass-through of monetary policy to bank lending rates under both the base rate and the MCLR regimes using dynamic panel data regression. Using different models, the paper estimates the degree of pass-through of monetary policy to bank lending rates under both the base rate and the MCLR regimes using dynamic panel data regression.

The paper said that alignment of liquidity management with the monetary policy stance, introduction of the flexible inflation targeting (FIT) framework and the deceleration in economic activity reducing credit demand could be contributory factors for better transmission during the MCLR regime. It can be noted that base rate was introduced in July 2010 as a system wherein banks cannot lend under a stated rate, while the MCLR came in April 2016 wherein the banks were given a formula to calculate their cost of funding and then conduct monthly reviews of their offerings across various tenors.