Ashok Wadhwa, Group CEO, Ambit Holdings Pvt Ltd believes the finance minister may increase service tax rate. If concessions are provided to any sector, then the government should not bring legislations through backdoor. He hopes the finance minister is forthright enough to plan things for a five year period, and not destroy confidence of the investor community by taking back incentives in the form of tax.
Below is the transcript of Ashok Wadhwa's interview with Latha Venkatesh and Sonia Shenoy on CNBC-TV18.
Latha: What will be the top tax points that you will watch out for?
A: The important message I want to see is that the three big pillars that the finance minister has spoken about, touched about fiscal deficit, investments and I dare say we cannot leave consumption out completely. There is just a lot of emphasis on investment and fiscal deficit, not recognising that consumption has really contracted over the last 12 months.
I would like to see tax incentives supporting each of these, so for Made in India clearly accelerated depreciation, investment allowances, new economic clusters, backward area tax concessions’ in term of fiscal deficits. I have absolutely not doubts that there is going to be rise in service tax because how else is the government going to increase its revenue and on the last issue of consumption, I do want to see how and what government can do even if it is small, even if it is token, even if it just by way of an indication to say I recognise demand has contracted, I need to provide a little greater support so even if they can provide some concession on excise duties, that will be a very welcome step.
Sonia: A lot of these SEZs have lost their charm because whatever concessions are given on SEZs are taken back in the form of MAT. So, that clarity is expected in this Budget. Do you think that the government has the leeway or the fiscal space to give more tax sops to SEZs for the Make in India theme?A: If you want to provide a concession, provide it for the defined period, do not try and brink in legislation back door to then try and reduce the benefit and the impact of that concession. This is where our investment cycle and confidence in investment has really suffered. People plan on the basis if five years and honestly they way minimum alternate tax (MAT) was introduced first on everything, then on capital gains tax, then on infrastructure, then on SEZ, the whole concession is seriously diluted. You know what you are doing? You are actually destroying the confidence of the investing population by bringing in back door taxes having offered concessions upfront. So, my serious advice to the Finance Minister at this stage would be, if you do not want to provide a concession, you can be quite forthright about it and say I do not have flexibility within my revenue collection cycle to provide that but having provided it please stay for it. You have a mandate for a period of five years; you are going to be the Finance Minister of this country for five years, you can actually plan things for once for a five year period so at least during your regime do not create that inconsistency and do not withdraw concessions that you give and indeed if Made in India and SEZs and infrastructure has t be successful you have to do something about either reducing because you may not have flexibility to withdraw but you have to at least show that you are prepared to reduce and hopefully at some stage withdraw so that enough money is left with the companies to reinvest in the businesses for which they are being set up.
For entire interview watch accompanying videos.
Discover the latest Business News, Sensex, and Nifty updates. Obtain Personal Finance insights, tax queries, and expert opinions on Moneycontrol or download the Moneycontrol App to stay updated!