HomeNewsBusinessMarketsAbrupt mid-term auditor exits rise in FY25; raise governance concerns

Abrupt mid-term auditor exits rise in FY25; raise governance concerns

The number of mid-term auditor resignations saw an increase in FY25 when compared to the previous fiscal when 34 such exits were announced.

May 05, 2025 / 17:18 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Data from primeinfobase shows that listed entities including Easy Trip Planners, Grasim Industries, State Bank Of India, Ind-Swift Laboratories, BASF India, 3i Infotech, Kalyani Forge, Inventure Growth & Securities, Arihant Capital Markets, Sanghi Industries and Kernex Microsystems (India) featured among the list the companies whose auditors made an abrupt exit in FY25.
Data from primeinfobase shows that listed entities including Easy Trip Planners, Grasim Industries, State Bank Of India, Ind-Swift Laboratories, BASF India, 3i Infotech, Kalyani Forge, Inventure Growth & Securities, Arihant Capital Markets, Sanghi Industries and Kernex Microsystems (India) featured among the list the companies whose auditors made an abrupt exit in FY25.

More than three dozen companies -- 39 to be precise -- saw an abrupt mid-term exit of their auditors in FY25 with well-known names from the top 500 NSE-listed companies making it to the list.

Data from primeinfobase shows that listed entities including Easy Trip Planners, Grasim Industries, State Bank Of India, Ind-Swift Laboratories, BASF India, 3i Infotech, Kalyani Forge, Inventure Growth & Securities, Arihant Capital Markets, Sanghi Industries and Kernex Microsystems (India) featured among the list the companies whose auditors made an abrupt exit in FY25.

Story continues below Advertisement

The number of such instances saw an increase in FY25 when compared to the previous fiscal when 34 such exits were announced. However, the trend has been on a rise if one compares it to the earlier years when such exits were in single digits or low double digits – it was in the range of 11-15 between FY14 and FY17.

Experts tracking this metric say that the number of such instances is growing every year and reflects poorly on the overall corporate governance levels. They attribute the trend to a combination of factors, including pressure from the promoters to inflate the numbers or ignore certain red flags.