HomeNewsBusinessEconomyDiscounts not needed to lure FIIs: Economic Secy
Trending Topics

Discounts not needed to lure FIIs: Economic Secy

Regarding the Know Your Customer norms that investors will have to meet when instruments exchange hands under this tweaked Mauritius treaty, Shaktikanta Das said the guidelines already exist. Sebi has fine-tuned them and made them more robust.

May 17, 2016 / 08:19 IST
Story continues below Advertisement

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 video.


In the wake of India signing the amended tax treaty with Mauritius, P-Notes have come under the spotlight. P-Notes are instruments issued by FIIs to overseas investors who aren't registered with Sebi. As such they are a source of irritiant because the names of investors are often hidden under layers of anonymity.

Speaking to CNBC-TV18, Shaktikanta Das, Economic Affairs Secretary, said announcements made regarding P-notes won't upset the market. 

Story continues below Advertisement

"We won't create a cumbersome procedure which puts off the market," he said, adding that a careful balance will have to be found. Market regulator SEBI will consult market players, he said.

Regarding the Know Your Customer norms that investors will have to meet when instruments exchange hands under this tweaked treaty, Das said the guidelines already exist. SEBI has fine-tuned them and made them more robust. "Only the loopholes will have to be addressed."Below is the verbatim transcript of Shaktikanta Das’s interview with Shereen Bhan on CNBC-TV18. Q: Since the markets are trading at this point in time and there is some degree of nervousness and anxiety on the issue of participatory notes (P-Notes) let me start by asking you about that because we understand that there is a board meeting of Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) on 20th and the P-Notes issue is going to be discussed at that board meeting. We do know what the Special Investigative Team (SIT) had recommended; I remember you had a conversation with me the day the SIT recommendations had come out on P-Notes saying that the markets have no need to worry, the government will not take any knee-jerk reaction. What should we expect on P-Notes? A: So far as P-Notes are concerned, as I had told you earlier, it will be done in a manner that will not upset the market. SEBI has already held consultations with various market players and whatever will be done, will be done in consultation with the market players. The regime has to be transparent enough and should be effective enough to get all the information. At the same time, we don’t want to create any cumbersome procedure or too much of an intrusive procedure which sort of puts off the market. So, therefore a careful balance has to be found and let me say that whatever we do, whatever SEBI does will be done in consultation with the various market players. Q: That is good to hear but let me ask you in terms of specifics now, because if one looks at the SIT recommendations and one understands that SEBI is looking at the possibility of implementing certain of those recommendations, in terms of the beneficial ownership issue and whether know your customer (KYC) should be made mandatory for P-Notes issue as at least above a certain threshold for individuals and a certain threshold for companies or firms, what is the decision that has been taken at least in consultation with the market regulator, where does Finance Ministry stand on this? A: The decision will be taken in the SEBI board meeting after detailed discussion with all the members present and no decision has been taken as yet. It will be discussed and a decision arrived at and at this point of time it will not be appropriate on my part to go into the details. Q: Do you believe KYC should be made mandatory for P-Notes? A: SEBI has a robust KYC mechanism. In fact over the last two years, SEBI has already fine tuned its KYC regime and it has been made fairly robust. We will see if there are few loopholes here and there or few gaps here and there. Only those issues need to be addressed. It is not as if we are trying to bring in a completely new regime, which sort of creates difficulty for market players. Having said that, let me also add that the fact that we now have an revised protocol, signed with Mauritius, with regards to the double taxation avoidance, I think a lot of the concerns which the SIT had or a lot of the concerns that we have in our fight against black money, I think they will get addressed because of the revised protocol. Q: One of the other key recommendations that the SIT or the concerned was this business of transferability. Are you going to be looking at that, is there likely to be any change as far as the transferability of Overseas Direct Investments (ODI) are concerned within the P-Note regime? A: You will have to wait for that. That is under discussion so it is not proper for me to give out the details. Q: The Finance Minister said whether it is Mauritius or P-Notes, it will be done in a phased manner. What should we expect now starting the May 20 which is when the SEBI board will meet to take up the issue of P-Notes? A: May 20 SEBI board, we will have a discussion. Now what decision, what will be the outcome that you will have to wait. We might as well decide to hold further consultations. So, it is not as if we are going to decide something on the May 20. Q: That is very important; you are saying that there may not be a final decision on the May 20 as far as the tweaking as you said of the P-Notes regime? A: I am saying there may or may not be a decision. If it is considered necessary we may decide to hold further consultations, but we will have to wait for May 20. Q: What is the sense that you get as of today, would you need further consultations on this issue? A: No, I don’t think I would like to go into the details. Q: Let me then ask you as far as the Mauritius treaty is concerned. The government has been trying to allay concerns on the impact of the amendments that have been now implemented but on the specifics as far as convertible debentures, non convertible debentures, exchange traded derivatives, etc are concerned, will the amendments apply or not, will they be taxable post April 1 2017? A: The amended protocol is very clear. So far as shares are concerned, there is no doubt. Then there are two other categories of instruments, one is immovable property and the other one is other instrument. Immovable properties, the right to tax is in the host country that is where the immovable property is located. With regard to the other kinds of instruments, which would include various kinds of convertible instruments, that the right to tax, that is in the country of origin. So, therefore that has been the practice, that is the ingredient in all our double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA), the right to tax, that component, is with the country of origin; that is residence base. Q: So debts and convertible instruments will be exempt from this new regime starting April 1 2017? A: Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) will in due course issue certain clarifications but as long as instruments have a debt character, as long as instruments do not have the character of a share, they will be taxed in the host country meaning in the country of origin. Q: Linked to that of course are the changes proposed now for Singapore because you said very clearly that Singapore is linked now to Mauritius. So, when do we expect now the amendments as far as the Singapore Treaty is concerned? A: These are two sovereign countries. Now, Singapore amendment, the Singapore protocol says that it will be coterminous; it will basically be a mirror image of what we do in the case of Mauritius. Singapore is a sovereign country so therefore the process of negotiation has to be initiated with Singapore now and I would expect this to be taken to a logical conclusion very quickly. Q: Within this financial year? A: I would not like to give a timeline but it should be a very simple process of negotiation. From our side we would like to do it as quickly as possible because this differential taxation regime between various tax jurisdictions, that should go because the whole idea is to create a level playing field between all countries and also a level playing field between investors who come through these jurisdictions and our domestic investors. Q: I know that that the Finance Ministry is being meeting with foreign portfolio investment (FPIs), trying to allay concerns, people like Mark Mobius have expressed concerns of foreign investors putting in money into India post the amendments as part of the Mauritius Treaty, domestic investors like Rakesh Jhunjhunwala on CNBC-TV18 welcoming the move by the government calling it a sensible decision but do you fear that foreign investors may in fact be deterred from putting in money into India post this and what have been the conversation that the Finance Ministry has had with them? A: India of 2016 is far different from India of 1983 when we entered into this protocol. Today, India stands on its own legs. It is a robust economy with very strong fundamentals. The economy has inherent resilient factors. We are focusing on strengthening the firewalls as the Finance Minister has said so in the Budget speech. Among the various investment destinations, especially emerging economies, India is perhaps one of the very few countries which is showing a robust growth. Indian markets are giving a good return so we are no longer in a situation where we need to give a discount to an investor to come into India. Q: But you were talking about the Indian market giving return. If I were to look at the picture between March 2015 and today, the Nifty is actually off about 14 percent from the March high of 9,000 plus and if I were to even take a look at the 2015 performance the markets are actually down in dollar terms? A: You have to compare with the percentage returns which the other markets world over have offered, you see the Indian growth we have come back to 7 percent plus and we say that it is robust in the context of growth that is witnessed in elsewhere in the world, so at 7.5-7.6 percent we feel it’s a robust and not just we, but the analyst world over. Comparatively it is a robust growth. Similarly, the returns our markets are offering are far better compare to the other markets. The Mauritius treaty is said to be silent on taxing gains from sale of derivates and debentures. Das said as far as share sale goes, the tax rules are clear. Two other categories of assets, namely 'immovable property' and 'other instruments' will have clear rules, too. "The host country will have the right to tax immovable property and the origin country will tax other instruments," he said.