HomeNewsBusinessDelhi High Court asks DDA to give details of land for developing forest

Delhi High Court asks DDA to give details of land for developing forest

The court had said conduct of the authorities was in 'total violation' of court orders against felling of trees and asked them to file an affidavit

April 01, 2024 / 19:33 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
The court's order came while dealing with contempt proceedings against the DDA over cutting down of several trees in the Southern Ridge area without due permission
The court's order came while dealing with contempt proceedings against the DDA over cutting down of several trees in the Southern Ridge area without due permission

The Delhi High Court on Monday asked the DDA to give details of the land parcel the agency would earmark for developing a 50-acre forest in the national capital. Justice Jasmeet Singh asked the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to file the affidavit in 10 days and said the land selected for the project should be ”sustainable”.

The court’s order came while dealing with contempt proceedings against the DDA over cutting down of several trees in the Southern Ridge area without due permission for constructing an approach road near South Asian University in Maidan Garhi.

Story continues below Advertisement

The DDA counsel tendered an apology and said although the trees were cut down, there was no ”wilful disobedience” as the field staff ”misconstrued” a Delhi government notification exempting around 4.9 hectares of the land from taking approval of the tree officer as the final permission for felling. The DDA counsel tendered an apology and said although the trees were cut down, there was no ”wilful disobedience” as the field staff ”misconstrued” a Delhi government notification exempting around 4.9 hectares of the land from taking approval of the tree officer as the final permission for felling.

Urging the court to not proceed further with contempt action, she said a 50-acre land parcel in the Madanpur Khadar area will be earmarked for developing an alternative forest. Lawyers Gautam Narayan and Aditya N Prasad, appearing as amici curiae to assist the court, said accountability must be fixed on the DDA for admittedly felling trees without permission and those concerned should not go ”scot free”.