HomeEntertainmentKingdom controversy: Madras High Court intervenes as protests against Vijay Deverakonda’s film intensify, makers say viral apology letter is fake
Trending Topics

Kingdom controversy: Madras High Court intervenes as protests against Vijay Deverakonda’s film intensify, makers say viral apology letter is fake

Vijay Deverakonda’s film Kingdom has ignited controversy in Tamil Nadu, with the Naam Tamilar Party alleging misrepresentation of the Tamil Eelam community. Protests led by Seeman have triggered vandalism and theater disruptions, prompting legal action and police involvement.

August 07, 2025 / 16:03 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Kingdom controversy: Madras High Court intervenes as protests against Vijay Deverakonda’s film intensify, makers say viral apology letter is fake
Kingdom controversy: Madras High Court intervenes as protests against Vijay Deverakonda’s film intensify, makers say viral apology letter is fake

The release of Vijay Deverakonda’s latest film Kingdom has sparked a major controversy in Tamil Nadu, drawing political heat and legal intervention. The Naam Tamilar Party, led by coordinator Seeman, has accused the film of misrepresenting the Tamil Eelam community. This allegation has led to widespread protests, including a statewide theater blockade, which has resulted in vandalism and disruptions across multiple cinema halls.

In response to the unrest, Tamil Nadu distributor SSI Productions filed a petition in the Madras High Court seeking police protection for theaters screening Kingdom. The matter was heard by Justice T. Bharat Chakravarthy, who was informed by the police that they had not yet received the petition and needed more time to respond. The case was subsequently adjourned to the next day.

Story continues below Advertisement

Naam Tamilar Party’s legal counsel, Shankar, claimed that the film portrayed Tamil Eelam in a negative light and dismissed the distributor’s petition as a publicity stunt. He insisted that the protests were peaceful and did not pose a threat to public order. However, the judge emphasized that any film approved by the censor board cannot be arbitrarily blocked. He stated that while democratic protests are constitutionally protected, they must remain non-violent. He further clarified that objections to a film’s content should be pursued through legal channels such as petitioning for cancellation of the censor certificate or calling for a public boycott.

Also Read: Radhika Apte calls out a Bollywood filmmaker for being insensitive during her pregnancy: ‘I wasn’t even allowed to see a doctor’