HomeNewsWorldElliott seeks $456 million from LME over Nickel chaos
Trending Topics

Elliott seeks $456 million from LME over Nickel chaos

The suit was filed by two Elliott vehicles against the LME and its clearing house in the English High Court on June 1, according to a statement issued by Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd., the parent company of the defendants.

June 06, 2022 / 12:18 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Traders, brokers and clerks on the trading floor of the open outcry pit at the London Metal Exchange Ltd. (LME) in London, U.K., on Monday, Feb. 28, 2022. The turmoil unleashed in commodity markets by Russia's invasion of Ukraine worsened on Monday as LNG orders were paused, finance for trade in raw materials dried up and Black Sea wheat sales froze.
Traders, brokers and clerks on the trading floor of the open outcry pit at the London Metal Exchange Ltd. (LME) in London, U.K., on Monday, Feb. 28, 2022. The turmoil unleashed in commodity markets by Russia's invasion of Ukraine worsened on Monday as LNG orders were paused, finance for trade in raw materials dried up and Black Sea wheat sales froze.

Paul Singer’s Elliott Investment Management is seeking $456 million in damages from the London Metal Exchange over its move in March to cancel nickel trades after a massive short squeeze.

The suit was filed by two Elliott vehicles against the LME and its clearing house in the English High Court on June 1, according to a statement issued by Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd., the parent company of the defendants. “The LME management is of the view that the claim is without merit and the LME will contest it vigorously,” it said in the statement.

Story continues below Advertisement

The move by the activist investor ratchets up pressure against the LME, which has been widely criticized for its decision to halt trading and cancel bets. The LME is also facing a review by UK regulators after it undid billions of dollars of transactions and halted trading for over a week. The nickel market has been stuck in an extended limbo of low liquidity and volatility since the crisis.

Elliott’s lawsuit is challenging the decision to cancel trades, claiming it was “unlawful on public law grounds and/or constituted a violation of their human rights,” according to the statement. The statement didn’t elaborate what trades Elliott had executed or the impact of the cancellation. The claimants were Elliott Associates, LP and Elliott International, LP.