HomeNewsTrendsLifestyle'Lessons in Chemistry' book review: A riveting story about sexism in science

'Lessons in Chemistry' book review: A riveting story about sexism in science

'Lessons in Chemistry' is a fizzing first novel for a number of reasons. Despite the serious theme, Bonnie Garmus’ writing, characterized by a dry wit, keeps us entertained.

July 31, 2022 / 09:16 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
In the last sixty years we have created a more equal world, but the gender disparity remains. (Representational image: Les Anderson via Unsplash)
In the last sixty years we have created a more equal world, but the gender disparity remains. (Representational image: Les Anderson via Unsplash)

A new book, about a female scientist in the 1960s, that has quietly but steadily created a buzz is Bonnie Garmus’ debut novel Lessons In Chemistry. Its opening sentence not only grabs the reader’s attention but also sets the tone and mood of the novel: ‘Back in 1961 when women wore shirtwaist dresses and joined garden clubs and drove legions of children around in seatbeltless cars without giving it a thought; back before anyone knew there’d even be a sixties movement, much less one that its participants would spend the next sixty years chronicling; back when the big wars were over and the secret wars had just begun and people were starting to think fresh and believe everything was possible, the thirty-year-old mother of Madeline Zott rose before dawn every morning and was certain of one thing: that her life was over.’

Chemistry is change

Story continues below Advertisement

Elizabeth Zott, a single mum, is an out-of-work chemist who is depressed. To pay the bills she takes up a TV gig, as the host in a cookery show, Supper at Six, meant for housewives. While that is how her employers see her new job description, Elizabeth expands it by imparting chemistry lessons to her audience. Why chemistry? ‘Because when women understand chemistry, they begin to understand how things work.’ They also ‘begin to see the limits that have been created for them.’ In no time at all, the show’s popularity sky-rockets and Elizabeth becomes a super star. Clearly she is an independent-minded, smart, plucky and ambitious woman. Why then does she continue to feel depressed?

To help us understand this, the story jumps back twelve years when working for her Master’s degree, Elizabeth was sexually assaulted by her supervisor. Besides the loss of reputation, the incident led to her being rescinded from the doctoral program. She had to settle for a lowly job as a research assistant at Hastings Institute where all the other scientists were male. Here, too, the casual everyday gender bias continued: scepticism about her ability despite her obvious talent and disparagement from other women, the administrative staff, who had internalised the rampant misogyny.