HomeNewsOpinionYes Bank | Why is a Financial Redressal Agency missing when it is needed most?

Yes Bank | Why is a Financial Redressal Agency missing when it is needed most?

One is really surprised how Yes Bank’s AT1 Bonds made way to retail investors. These bonds are highly complex instruments and even financial experts will struggle to explain the mechanics of the bond.

April 27, 2020 / 12:21 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Representative Image
Representative Image

Amol Agrawal

It is highly unlikely that Elizabeth Warren, who just lost and stepped out of the Democratic race to the United States presidential elections later this year, has any knowledge of ongoing Yes Bank saga. However, the fallout of the bank might interest her — especially the case of selling so-called AT1 (Additional Tier 1) Bonds to retail investors. After all, Warren rose to fame after the 2008 crisis fighting the misselling of financial products to retail investors.

Story continues below Advertisement

As the US crisis was heating up, in a 2007 article Warren argued how it was difficult to see a bread toaster putting a house on fire, but at the same time there was a strong chance that mortgages could lead to families burning all their income and be made homeless. She pointed how this was not always the case and there was a time when buying a toaster meant risking outing the house on fire, narrating her own experience. Thanks to government regulations, safety standards of toasters improved and made them safer for households to buy toasters without worrying of a fire.

We need similar practices for financial products as well, which, if not putting a house on fire, can create similar experiences of loss of property, being homeless and so on. Warren was a Professor at Harvard at that time and led campaigns to instituting a regulatory agency for protecting the interests of consumers against misseling of financial products. Her efforts led to Consumer Financial Protection Board in 2011.