HomeNewsOpinionWhy are power producers looking beyond turnkey contracts for new projects

Why are power producers looking beyond turnkey contracts for new projects

As power projects have become more and more intricate along with their ever-increasing cost overruns, both IPPs and contractors have become increasingly cautious about committing to lumpsum turnkey EPC contracts. IPPs are now exploring alternative strategies to retain contractor involvement while ensuring the economic viability of their most substantial projects

September 20, 2023 / 13:16 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Power
A world with increasing demand for cleaner and more sustainable energy sources, independent power producers (IPPs) face a multitude of intricate challenges, especially in the realm of contractual structures.

The energy and power sector is on the cusp of a transformative new era, driven by a confluence of factors that are reshaping the industry landscape. This new era is marked by significant shifts in technology, policy and market dynamics — all aimed at achieving greater sustainability, reliability, and efficiency in the production and distribution of energy. In a world with increasing demand for cleaner and more sustainable energy sources, independent power producers (IPPs) face a multitude of intricate challenges, especially in the realm of contractual structures. Gone are the days when having ‘turnkey contracts’ where a single contractor oversaw all project phases was the norm. Instead, we now find ourselves in an era where multi-contractor arrangements take centre stage.

Traditionally, IPPs heavily relied on lumpsum engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contracts as their primary method for project procurement. These EPC contracts result in the transfer of broad, substantial and well-defined risks to the primary contractor. While this transfer of risk resulted in increased costs for IPPs (including overhead, profit, and contingency mark-ups that could exceed those of procurement models with more owner risk), the trade-off of the reduction in the risk that the owner was exposed to, provided the much-needed assurance and confidence to the project financiers. However, as power projects have become more and more intricate along with their ever-increasing cost overruns, both IPPs and contractors have become increasingly cautious about committing to lumpsum turnkey EPC contracts. IPPs are now exploring alternative strategies to retain contractor involvement while ensuring the economic viability of their most substantial projects.

Story continues below Advertisement

Alternative To EPC Contracts

Currently, various alternatives to traditional contractual structures are being considered by IPPs and contractors to successfully navigate the shifting market dynamics. One such emerging structure is the hybrid framework, designed to strike a balance between the cost and risk exposure of the project owners and contractors. This balance is achieved by either allocating distinct pricing components to different phases of the project (for example, pricing engineering and procurement services as a lumpsum with lower inherent risk, while valuing construction work using a unit rate remeasure or reimbursable basis with higher inherent risk) or by assigning tasks to different contractors. For instance, the equipment supplier may provide the necessary equipment and spare parts, the technology provider may oversee engineering and procurement-related activities, and a regional construction specialist may handle on-site construction activities.