HomeNewsOpinionOPINION | Transforming real estate insolvency and recovery through IBC reforms

OPINION | Transforming real estate insolvency and recovery through IBC reforms

India’s real estate insolvency landscape under the IBC continues to evolve, balancing homebuyers’ rights, project-wise resolutions, and safeguards against speculative misuse, while reinforcing constitutional protections and regulatory coordination through recent judicial developments

November 12, 2025 / 10:55 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
real estate
real estate

The real estate sector in India, both residential and commercial, has long posed challenges for creditors, homebuyers and developers. The introduction of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) promised a time-bound mechanism to maximise asset value and resolve distressed entities. In practice, real estate insolvencies under the IBC have differed in character and are more complex than corporate insolvencies in other sectors. Recent jurisprudence and judgments provide several important lessons for real estate entities and homebuyers.

Homebuyers as financial creditors

Story continues below Advertisement

A major flashpoint in real estate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Processes (CIRPs) is the status of homebuyers or allottees when a developer (residential or commercial) undergoes CIRP under the IBC. In the past, homebuyers were not automatically classified as financial creditors, though they paid substantial sums to developers and suffered delays or defaults. The real estate sector under the IBC continues to evolve in both regulatory design and judicial interpretation.

By virtue of the 2018 amendment to Section 5(8)(f) of the IBC, any amount raised from an allottee under a real estate project has the commercial effect of borrowing, thereby recognising homebuyers as financial creditors. Subsequent IBC amendments in 2020 introduced a collective filing threshold (a minimum of 100 or 10% of allottees under the same project) to curb speculative misuse.