HomeNewsOpinionRate Hikes: New Zealand's central bank owns this recession

Rate Hikes: New Zealand's central bank owns this recession

The country was an early mover in raising rates lifting borrowing costs a cumulative 5.25 percentage points in 20 months, a brisker clip than the US Fed. Governor Adrian Orr had forthrightly stated that he was inducing a recession with aggressive interest-rate hikes. Now with GDP declining in successive quarters, the central bank will be held responsible for the downturn, its depth and duration

June 27, 2023 / 10:20 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
New Zealand central bank
The New Zealand central bank lifted borrowingcosts a cumulative 5.25 percentage points in less than 20 months, a brisker clip than the Fed.

Do central banks have to snuff out growth to do their job?

The question isn’t a new one, but it’s about to get more attention. New Zealand, a tiny place with a big role in economic history because of its early deployment of inflation targets, has skidded into recession. More countries are bound to follow, with uncomfortable scrutiny falling on policymakers. Everyone wants inflation to come down. Few are impressed with the bill when it does.

Story continues below Advertisement

Monetary policy was, at the very least, present at the demise of the Kiwi expansion. And it had a motive: Reserve Bank of New Zealand Governor Adrian Orr had forthrightly stated that he was trying to induce a recession with aggressive interest-rate hikes. This isn’t as malicious as it might sound; Orr was merely being more candid than his counterparts. Most have spent the better part two years trying to combat price increases by ratcheting up borrowing costs, the intent being to put the brakes on economies to the point where inflation begins to meaningfully retreat.

Overreach is in the cards because monetary medicine works with lags. It can take months or years for changes to be fully felt. It’s hard for officials to know when to stop, especially when they have been lashed for being slow off the mark. In the final stages of the 2009-2020 US growth stretch, former Federal Reserve chairs Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen discussed endgames at a conference in Atlanta. Expansions rarely expire simply from old age, Yellen observed. Bernanke went further, stating they were often murdered.

Colorful language aside, the issue is pertinent today. Officials can’t bring themselves to wrap tightening. The rate cuts once confidently foreseen by traders and some economists look more distant. Policy seems to be predicated on the idea that you can actually hear inflation snap — and that the break will be audible when and where needed to forestall a painful downturn. It’s an enormous gamble, but people have convinced themselves that a distressing end is almost inevitable, if not desirable. Nobody wants to be the central banker that let inflation become entrenched, to go down in history as the person who ruined the legacy of Paul Volcker, the Fed chief credited with crushing inflation in the early 1980s. Mopping up from job losses will be tomorrow’s problem.