HomeNewsOpinionAntrix-Devas Deal | Bring white paper to highlight this 'fraud against India'

Antrix-Devas Deal | Bring white paper to highlight this 'fraud against India'

The BJP-led NDA government has not received sufficient credit for clearing many of the problems it inherited from the Congress-led UPA era. The NPA crisis, and the retrospective taxation issue are examples 

January 19, 2022 / 09:23 IST
Story continues below Advertisement

The January 17 Supreme Court order on the Antrix-Devas liquidation matter is nothing short of ground-breaking. Its implications go beyond the legal, into ethical and political domains. Unlike Cairn or Vodafone, this was not a case of a country reneging on extant laws by invoking retrospective amendment, but undoing a monumental fraud perpetrated on an arm of a sovereign State. That is a herculean achievement for a government that, so far, had a mixed record in legal matters. In the press conference held by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on January 18 the minister stressed how the Antrix-Devas deal, which was signed when the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) was in power, was a “fraud against India”.

The scale and modus operandi of the scam was so clear that the court had no hesitation in throwing out of the window the oft repeated argument of the decision sending out wrong signals to the internal investor community — an argument used in the matter of retrospective taxation. Specifically commenting on the issue, the court said that “allowing Devas and its shareholders to reap the benefit of their fraudulent action… may send another wrong message”.

Story continues below Advertisement

While that settles the points of law, at least in the domestic courts, it leaves open larger ethical questions on the responsibilities of the executive. From the evidence that has come to light, those who were involved in the decision were complicit at each stage, including in pursuing legal recourse, and defending the international arbitration.

The latter has put India on precarious grounds with Devas invoking the arbitration award for attaching Indian sovereign property in many countries around the world. Though the Supreme Court of India judgment may buttress India’s arguments, how far it would help us in foreign courts remains to be seen. Without doubt it will be a major challenge for the government’s law officers and legal advisers.