HomeNewsLifestyleBooksThe Cooking of Books Review: Ramachandra Guha’s striking memoir of a long-distance relationship between a writer and his editor

The Cooking of Books Review: Ramachandra Guha’s striking memoir of a long-distance relationship between a writer and his editor

With self-deprecating frankness, Guha details his growth as a writer in the hands of his editor Rukun Advani. The memoir, a rich mine for budding writers, looks back at a vanished pre-internet publishing world, where books were celebrated more than authors.

February 04, 2024 / 19:23 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Author Ramachandra Guha (left), his long-time editor Rukun Advani, and the story of the writer-editor relationship in Guha's new memoir 'The Cooking of Books'.
Author Ramachandra Guha (left), his long-time editor Rukun Advani, and the story of the writer-editor relationship in Guha's new memoir 'The Cooking of Books'.

One wouldn’t be off the mark if one had thought that the art of letter writing was dead, it remains relegated to an old shoebox. However, there’s some comfort to be had: Ramachandra Guha has written a whole book as a tribute to it. A well-known television personality, newspaper columnist, essayist and, as historian and biographer, a prolific non-fiction author (The Unquiet Woods, A Corner of a Foreign Field, This Fissured Land, Makers of Modern India, India After Gandhi) Guha’s latest work is a memoir. Titled The Cooking of Books, it chronicles the four decades-long relationship between the writer and Rukun Advani, his first editor.

Says Guha in the Preface, ‘I am a creature of habit, from the way I structure my day’s work to the manner in which I organise my year’s travel.’ The COVID-19 pandemic, which left him ‘marooned in South India,’ was the reason why he turned to the vast cache of letters in his personal archive. These letters form the core of a unique narrative. Unique because an uninterrupted long-term association between a writer and his editor is uncommon; secondly, the relationship is conducted primarily through post and, later, through emails.

Story continues below Advertisement

‘Nehruvian Indians’

As Guha takes pains to explain in the early chapters, he and Advani were contemporaries at Delhi University’s St Stephen’s College in the early 1970s, though Advani was the senior by a couple of years. ‘He was the first student in years to get a first class in English,’ ‘phenomenally well read,’ with a cultivated taste in music; he was also ‘famously antisocial.’ Guha describes himself as ‘boisterous and badly dressed,’ ‘highly gregarious’ and a ‘sports type’ who had joined the college mainly to play cricket while earning a degree in Economics on the side. These  differences  apart, Guha also emphasises the commonality of being ‘Nehruvian Indians’ who ‘were unreconstructed modernists, placing great faith in the powers of science and technology to transform India and make it ‘a developed nation’. We did not disparage religion or ritual but rarely practiced it ourselves.’ The dissimilarities, however, meant that despite having friends in common, the two never actually met in their college years.