HomeNewsIndiaStoreroom where burnt cash was found under active control of Justice Varma and family: Panel
Trending Topics

Storeroom where burnt cash was found under active control of Justice Varma and family: Panel

The allegation was repeatedly denied by Justice Varma in his responses to the Delhi High Court chief justice and the Supreme Court-appointed panel.

May 30, 2025 / 23:03 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Justice Yashwant Varma
Justice Yashwant Varma

A Supreme Court-appointed committee, which has indicted Allahabad High Court judge Yashwant Varma in a cash-discovery row, has said the access to the storeroom where burnt cash was found was under the ”active control” of the judge and his family, sources said.

They said the panel has found some evidence that indicate that the burnt cash was removed from the storeroom on May 15 after a fire incident came to light.Earlier this month, the then Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna wrote to President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, besides sharing with them the committee report, along with the response received from Justice Varma.

Story continues below Advertisement

The sources said the panel, which considered evidence including electronic evidence, has opined in its report that the allegations are serious enough to commence proceedings for Justice Varma’s removal.The panel has analysed the evidence and recorded the statements of more than 50 people, including Delhi Police Commissioner Sanjay Arora and the Delhi Fire Services chief, who were among the first responders to the fire incident at Justice Varma’s official Lutyen’s Delhi residence at 11:35 pm on March 14.Justice Varma was a judge of the Delhi High Court then.

The allegation was repeatedly denied by Justice Varma in his responses to the Delhi High Court chief justice and the Supreme Court-appointed panel.The apex court administration recently rejected a plea seeking the committee report under the Right to Information Act.The RTI application had also sought a disclosure of the communication between the then CJI and the president and the prime minister over the matter.