HomeNewsIndiaStalin wins a crucial battle in court, but a truce with Raj Bhavan is unlikely

Stalin wins a crucial battle in court, but a truce with Raj Bhavan is unlikely

The Supreme Court reprimand of Ravi for being a ‘hindrance’ to the state government instead of being a ‘friend, philosopher and guide’ is a culmination of a long three-year cold war.

April 09, 2025 / 19:18 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Stalin wins a crucial battle in court, but a truce with Raj Bhavan is unlikely
Tamil Nadu governor RN Ravi with Chief Minister MK Stalin. (File photo/PTI)

A Centre-state dispute in Tamil Nadu not only took on political colours, but was also reduced to a clash of personalities over time. Constitutional issues relating to the gubernatorial office and federal principles first morphed into a DMK-BJP slugfest involving the Raj Bhavan before turning into a personal ego battle between chief minister MK Stalin and Governor RN Ravi.

The Supreme Court reprimand of Ravi for being a ‘hindrance’ to the state government instead of being a ‘friend, philosopher and guide’ is a culmination of a long three-year cold war that was fought not only over interpretation of constitutional provisions and assembly procedures, but also over details of personal etiquette and mutual respect.

Story continues below Advertisement

That the Governor would behave as a representative of the Centre was a given right from Ravi assuming office in 2021, just a few months after the DMK government was sworn in. Although not a career politician, Ravi, a retired Indian Police Service officer, seemed closely aligned with the BJP’s brand of politics. Often, during his public engagements, he attacked the Dravidian model of governance held up by the DMK government and Stalin in particular as an alternative to the Gujarat model touted by the BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. At one point, he described the Dravidian model as an expired ideology that reinforced ‘linguistic apartheid’ and was anathema to the unity of India.

But prior to that, in 2023, he refused to read out the customary Governor’s address at the start of the first session of the year, prepared by the state government, saying the address, instead of highlighting government policies, merely praised the Dravidian governance model. Claiming the government had “numerous passages with misleading claims far from truth”, he walked out of the Assembly.