HomeNewsIndia‘Fit-for-purpose’: India calls for UNSC reform, transparency, expanded membership

‘Fit-for-purpose’: India calls for UNSC reform, transparency, expanded membership

He also called for expansion in both permanent and non-permanent membership, ensuring adequate representation for under-represented and non-represented geographies, “through text-based negotiations in a time-bound manner.”

November 15, 2025 / 10:51 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Harish also urged the Council to adopt measures under the UN80 framework to streamline operations, including the introduction of sunset clauses for outdated mandates.
Harish also urged the Council to adopt measures under the UN80 framework to streamline operations, including the introduction of sunset clauses for outdated mandates.

India, on Friday, urged the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) to adopt “greater transparency” in its working methods, citing the opaque manner in which requests to designate entities and individuals are rejected.

Speaking at the UNSC open debate on working methods, India’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish, said, “As a UN organ whose sphere of functions covers a range of areas, but membership is limited to only 15 members, working methods of the Security Council are critical to its credibility, efficacy, efficiency, and transparency. This gains particular salience in a world beset with multiple crises and facing numerous challenges.”

Story continues below Advertisement

Harish highlighted the lack of clarity in listing decisions, adding, “A case in point is the manner in which listing requests are rejected. Unlike de-listing decisions, these are done in a rather obscure manner, with member states that are not on the Council not being privy to details.”

On the issue of committee leadership, he said, “Chairs and pen-holderships of the Council’s committees and subsidiary organs are privileges that come with major responsibilities. Discussions in the Council on distribution of Chairs and pen-holderships must prevent Council members with vested interests from being accorded these privileges. Obvious and outright conflicts of interest can have no place in the Council.”