HomeNewsBusinessRC Bhargava: This is a ‘Maruti Moment’ for Modi Govt on Privatisation

RC Bhargava: This is a ‘Maruti Moment’ for Modi Govt on Privatisation

While the speed of implementation will determine how quickly benefits flow, the reaction of investors and the stock market demonstrates that the decision has created confidence that the country’s economic growth trajectory will increase sharply.

February 16, 2021 / 19:57 IST
Story continues below Advertisement

R C Bhargava

The privatisation proposals in the budget of Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, followed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi's speech in Parliament regarding the future role of the private sector in the economic development of the country, are truly game changing events for our economy. Despite our large potential for economic and industrial development, we have consistently underperformed over decades. In this period, our policies sought industrial development, but creating competitiveness was not an objective. In addition, these same policies also sought to achieve social objectives and to further socialism. The limited success achieved over decades proves that they need change.

Story continues below Advertisement

From the time of the First Five Year plan the economic strategy was to establish public sector enterprises and let them play the dominant role in industrialising the country. These undertakings were also tasked to promote social objectives. Having dual objectives and working within the legal and administrative structure for PSU’s, resulted in underachievement of both. Most undertakings failed to generate adequate internal resources and so could not modernise facilities, expand production capacity or invest adequately in technology development. Instead of paying reasonable dividends, many had to periodically rely on tax revenues for funds.

Private sector growth till 1991 was curtailed by the licensing policy. Manufacturing was not competitive for various reasons, including the pricing of inputs being based on socialistic considerations. Demand for many manufactured products was also suppressed for socialistic considerations. In 1991, the licensing policy was abolished but very little else was done to make manufacturing competitive. The policy for foreign investments was modified and government actively sought to attract investments in manufacturing. The results have remained disappointing till now as infrastructure shortcomings and the inability to manufacture competitively have been deterrents.