Moneycontrol
HomeNewsBusinessGitanjali Gems case | Sebi bans Mehul Choksi, oen more from capital markets for 1 year, slaps Rs 2.5 crore fine
Trending Topics

Gitanjali Gems case | Sebi bans Mehul Choksi, oen more from capital markets for 1 year, slaps Rs 2.5 crore fine

Both of them have been restrained from buying, selling, or otherwise dealing in securities of Gitanjali Gems Ltd (GGL) for a period of two years.

January 31, 2022 / 22:42 IST
Story continues below Advertisement

Mehul Choksi (Image: Moneycontrol)

Sebi has barred fugitive businessman Mehul Choksi and one Rakesh Girdharlal Gajera from the capital markets for one year and levied a fine totalling Rs 2.5 crore on them for violating insider trading rules in the matter of Gitanjali Gems. In addition, they have been restrained from buying, selling or otherwise dealing in securities of Gitanjali Gems Ltd (GGL) for a period of two years.

Also, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has directed Gajera to disgorge a sum of Rs 15.82 crore. Choksi, promoter and managing director of Gitanjali Gems, is the maternal uncle of Nirav Modi, both of whom are facing charges of defrauding state-run Punjab National Bank (PNB) of over Rs 14,000 crore. Both Choksi and Modi fled India after the PNB scam came to light in early 2018.

Story continues below Advertisement

While Choksi is said to be in Antigua, Modi is lodged in a British jail and has challenged India's extradition request. In its order, Sebi said Choksi communicated unpublished price sensitive information (UPSI) to Gajera, who sold his entire shareholding of 5.75 percent in GGL in December 2017 with the intention of avoiding loss ahead of the disclosure of fraudulent issuance of LoUs (letters of undertaking) by Gitanjali Group.

It was noted that fraudulent LoUs were issued on behalf of entities belonging to the Gitanjali Group, including GGL. "Noticee no. 1 (Choksi) was found to have communicated UPSI (unpublished price sensitive information) to Noticee no. 2 (Gajera) without any underlying legal obligation or any legitimate purpose,'' Sebi said in its 60-page final order. Through such activities, they violated the provisions of PIT (Prohibition of Insider Trading) rules.