HomeEntertainmentMoviesBastar: How The Kerala Story makers co-opts the tribal story and courts controversy

Bastar: How The Kerala Story makers co-opts the tribal story and courts controversy

Many Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) students are riled by the film’s claim that there were “celebrations in JNU” on the killing of Indian soldiers.

March 17, 2024 / 02:38 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Adah Sharma in a still from the just-released Bastar.
Adah Sharma in a still from the just-released Bastar.

The Kerala Story makers, Vipul Amrutlal Shah and Sudipto Sen, are back in the news for the same reasons as before: for playing with fire, with their new film Bastar, starring, yet again, Adah Sharma, who fails to impress this time, according to a section of those who heaped praises upon her last act in the previous film.

But before one dives into the politics of the film, which is loud and clear, one must question the cultural appropriation of the tribal story in the film made by non-Adivasis. Where are the Adivasis or the Adivasi voice in the film? From the cast to crew, city dwellers, who have no idea what the Adivasi experience has been, are telling the story of Bastar.

Story continues below Advertisement

There is history of why the Naxal movement was born, for those interested in studying it. Movements are born out of systemic oppression. When any section is pushed against the wall, it will revolt. Whether their means are right or wrong is for the law of the land to decide. The Adivasi land grabbing and oppression continues to this date, decades since the British left. Where else are the mines built? Why has the country's green cover drastically reduced?

And here lies one of the biggest problems with the film: conflating of timelines. Naxal uprising originated in 1967 in Bengal. And, the film, Bastar: The Naxal Story, is based on the 1910 Bastar rebellion, also known as the Bhumkal movement. It is a revolt by Adivasis in 1910 against the British rule in princely state of Bastar in central India. Between 1910 and 1967, a tectonic shift had happened in the country: the Partition. So, the film draws the anti-British sentiments and superimposes it in contemporary times to suit the zeitgeist. That is a reductionist way of looking at history.