HomeWorld'Stymied at every turn': Trump’s administration struggles with courts; frustration and legal confrontations

'Stymied at every turn': Trump’s administration struggles with courts; frustration and legal confrontations

Trump’s administration has clashed with the judiciary, displaying frustration with court rulings, including challenges to deportation orders and executive decisions, while pushing for greater presidential authority and bypassing judicial checks.

April 22, 2025 / 13:20 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Trump's administration expresses frustration with courts, challenging rulings and authority.
Trump's administration expresses frustration with courts, challenging rulings and authority.

In his second term, President Donald Trump has tested the limits of the rule of law in America as never before, pushing boundaries that threaten to upend long-standing democratic principles. His actions have frequently brought the U.S. close to a constitutional crisis, at times defying judicial authority, advocating for the removal of established rights like birthright citizenship, and even suggesting that U.S. citizens convicted of violent crimes could be deported to foreign jails.

Trump’s combative approach has often targeted judges who issue rulings he disagrees with, even making personal attacks on those judges. At times, members of his administration have suggested that judicial orders can be ignored, creating further tension with the judiciary. Earlier this month, a federal judge determined that the Trump administration’s “reckless disregard” of his order in a deportation case provided probable cause for holding the government in criminal contempt.

Story continues below Advertisement

In addition to these contentious interactions with the courts, Trump has taken aim at law firms that have opposed him. Through executive orders, he has sought to deny certain firms the security clearances necessary to consult on protected information, restricted their access to government officials and buildings, and cut off federal contracts. Some firms have fought back with lawsuits, while others have complied, offering nearly $1 billion worth of free legal representation for causes closely aligned with the administration’s agenda, such as police and first responders.

The government's actions have been described as "breathtaking in its audacity and lack of decorum" by retired federal judge John Jones, who was appointed by President George W. Bush. "It's unlike anything I have ever seen from the Justice Department," Jones told CNN.