advance

decline

unchanged

ticker

name

price

change

changePercent

seo_string

symbol

The S&amp;P 500 ended slightly higher on Monday as a deal for Silicon Valley Bank's assets helped to boost bank shares, while a decline in technology-related stocks limited the day's gains.

The S&amp;P 500 banks index (.SPXBK) rose 3.1%, while the KBW regional banking index (.KRX) ended up 0.6%.

JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co (JPM.N) shares climbed 2.9% and Bank of America (BAC.N) added 5%. They were among stocks giving the S&amp;P 500 its biggest boost on Monday.

Shares of First Citizens BancShares Inc (FCNCA.O) shot up more than 50% after it said it would acquire the deposits and loans of Silicon Valley Bank, which failed earlier this month in the largest bank collapse since the 2008 financial crisis.

Also, shares of First Republic Bank (FRC.N) were up 11.8% after Bloomberg reported U.S. authorities were considering more support for banks, which could give the struggling First Republic more time to shore up its balance sheet.

Tech-related growth shares were lower, however, and the Nasdaq ended down on the day.

"There's still a lot going on in the financial sector, and it's actually good news today," said Tim Ghriskey, senior portfolio strategist at Ingalls &amp; Snyder in New York.

But tech and growth stocks have "had a very strong quarter, so there may be some profit-taking as we head into the end of the quarter."

The Dow Jones Industrial Average (.DJI) rose 194.55 points, or 0.6%, to 32,432.08, the S&amp;P 500 (.SPX) gained 6.54 points, or 0.16%, to 3,977.53 and the Nasdaq Composite (.IXIC) dropped 55.12 points, or 0.47%, to 11,768.84.

Shares of Apple (AAPL.O) were down 1.2%. The S&amp;P 500 technology index (.SPLRCT) is up more than 16% for the quarter so far.

Crypto shares were also down Monday after the Commodity Futures Trading Commission said crypto exchange Binance and its CEO and founder Changpeng Zhao have been sued by the CFTC for operating an "illegal" exchange and a "sham" compliance program.

Among other stock gainers, Walt Disney (DIS.N) shares ended up 1.6% after the company began 7,000 in layoffs announced earlier this year.

Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 2.57-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.44-to-1 ratio favored advancers.

The S&amp;P 500 posted 6 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 56 new highs and 128 new lows.

Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.32 billion shares, compared with the 12.9 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.

S&P 500 ends up slightly; SVB deal lifts bank shares

The S&P 500 banks index (.SPXBK) rose 3.1%, while the KBW regional banking index (.KRX) ended up 0.6%.

The S&amp;amp;P 500 ended slightly higher on Monday as a deal for Silicon Valley Bank's assets helped to boost bank shares, while a decline in technology-related stocks limited the day's gains.

The S&amp;amp;P 500 banks index (.SPXBK) rose 3.1%, while the KBW regional banking index (.KRX) ended up 0.6%.

JPMorgan Chase &amp;amp; Co (JPM.N) shares climbed 2.9% and Bank of America (BAC.N) added 5%. They were among stocks giving the S&amp;amp;P 500 its biggest boost on Monday.

Shares of First Citizens BancShares Inc (FCNCA.O) shot up more than 50% after it said it would acquire the deposits and loans of Silicon Valley Bank, which failed earlier this month in the largest bank collapse since the 2008 financial crisis.

Also, shares of First Republic Bank (FRC.N) were up 11.8% after Bloomberg reported U.S. authorities were considering more support for banks, which could give the struggling First Republic more time to shore up its balance sheet.

Tech-related growth shares were lower, however, and the Nasdaq ended down on the day.

&quot;There's still a lot going on in the financial sector, and it's actually good news today,&quot; said Tim Ghriskey, senior portfolio strategist at Ingalls &amp;amp; Snyder in New York.

But tech and growth stocks have &quot;had a very strong quarter, so there may be some profit-taking as we head into the end of the quarter.&quot;

The Dow Jones Industrial Average (.DJI) rose 194.55 points, or 0.6%, to 32,432.08, the S&amp;amp;P 500 (.SPX) gained 6.54 points, or 0.16%, to 3,977.53 and the Nasdaq Composite (.IXIC) dropped 55.12 points, or 0.47%, to 11,768.84.

Shares of Apple (AAPL.O) were down 1.2%. The S&amp;amp;P 500 technology index (.SPLRCT) is up more than 16% for the quarter so far.

Crypto shares were also down Monday after the Commodity Futures Trading Commission said crypto exchange Binance and its CEO and founder Changpeng Zhao have been sued by the CFTC for operating an &quot;illegal&quot; exchange and a &quot;sham&quot; compliance program.

Among other stock gainers, Walt Disney (DIS.N) shares ended up 1.6% after the company began 7,000 in layoffs announced earlier this year.

Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 2.57-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.44-to-1 ratio favored advancers.

The S&amp;amp;P 500 posted 6 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 56 new highs and 128 new lows.

Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.32 billion shares, compared with the 12.9 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.

S&amp;P 500 ends up slightly; SVB deal lifts bank shares

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has issued a warning that the risks to global financial stability have increased and called for greater vigilance. The IMF's report was published on Saturday and highlighted that the risks are mainly coming from the continued uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on economies around the world.

The report also highlighted that the global economic recovery has been uneven, with some countries and sectors recovering faster than others. This uneven recovery has led to growing economic imbalances and vulnerabilities, which could increase the risks of financial instability.

Also read: <a href="https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/economy/sri-lanka-gets-3-billion-bailout-from-imf-10282751.html" target="_blank">Sri Lanka gets $3-billion bailout from IMF</a>

The IMF urged policymakers to take appropriate measures to mitigate these risks, including strengthening financial regulation and supervision, improving crisis management frameworks, and promoting greater transparency and disclosure.

The report also emphasized the need for countries to work together to address global challenges, such as climate change, cybersecurity, and the ongoing digital transformation of the economy. The IMF called for greater international cooperation and coordination to ensure that the benefits of these transformations are shared equitably and that the risks are appropriately managed.

The IMF's warning comes at a time of heightened concern about the state of the global economy. Many countries are still struggling to recover from the pandemic, and there are fears that new variants of the virus could derail the fragile economic recovery.

Also read:<a href="https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/indian-economy-well-poised-to-face-global-headwinds-believes-imfs-luis-breuer-10252301.html" target="_blank"> Indian economy well-poised to face global headwinds, believes IMF’s Luis Breuer</a>

In addition to the pandemic, there are also concerns about rising inflation, which could further destabilize the global economy. The IMF's report highlighted the need for policymakers to be vigilant about inflation risks, and to take appropriate measures to address them.

The IMF's warning is a timely reminder that the global economy remains vulnerable and that policymakers must remain vigilant and take appropriate action to mitigate the risks. The IMF's report provides a roadmap for policymakers to address these risks and ensure that the global economic recovery is sustainable and inclusive.

In essence, the IMF warned that the risks to global financial stability have increased, and called for greater vigilance. The report highlights the need for policymakers to take appropriate measures to mitigate these risks, including strengthening financial regulation and supervision, improving crisis management frameworks, and promoting greater transparency and disclosure.

The report also emphasizes the need for countries to work together to address global challenges, such as climate change, cybersecurity, and the ongoing digital transformation of the economy.

The IMF's warning is a timely reminder that the global economy remains vulnerable and that policymakers must remain vigilant and take appropriate action to ensure that the global economic recovery is sustainable and inclusive.

Transparency and disclosure key to addressing risks to global financial stability, says IMF report

The report also highlighted that the global economic recovery has been uneven, with some countries and sectors recovering faster than others. This uneven recovery has led to growing economic imbalances and vulnerabilities, which could increase the risks of financial instability.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has issued a warning that the risks to global financial stability have increased and called for greater vigilance. The IMF's report was published on Saturday and highlighted that the risks are mainly coming from the continued uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on economies around the world.

The report also highlighted that the global economic recovery has been uneven, with some countries and sectors recovering faster than others. This uneven recovery has led to growing economic imbalances and vulnerabilities, which could increase the risks of financial instability.

Also read: Sri Lanka gets $3-billion bailout from IMF

The IMF urged policymakers to take appropriate measures to mitigate these risks, including strengthening financial regulation and supervision, improving crisis management frameworks, and promoting greater transparency and disclosure.

The report also emphasized the need for countries to work together to address global challenges, such as climate change, cybersecurity, and the ongoing digital transformation of the economy. The IMF called for greater international cooperation and coordination to ensure that the benefits of these transformations are shared equitably and that the risks are appropriately managed.

The IMF's warning comes at a time of heightened concern about the state of the global economy. Many countries are still struggling to recover from the pandemic, and there are fears that new variants of the virus could derail the fragile economic recovery.

Also read: Indian economy well-poised to face global headwinds, believes IMF’s Luis Breuer

In addition to the pandemic, there are also concerns about rising inflation, which could further destabilize the global economy. The IMF's report highlighted the need for policymakers to be vigilant about inflation risks, and to take appropriate measures to address them.

The IMF's warning is a timely reminder that the global economy remains vulnerable and that policymakers must remain vigilant and take appropriate action to mitigate the risks. The IMF's report provides a roadmap for policymakers to address these risks and ensure that the global economic recovery is sustainable and inclusive.

In essence, the IMF warned that the risks to global financial stability have increased, and called for greater vigilance. The report highlights the need for policymakers to take appropriate measures to mitigate these risks, including strengthening financial regulation and supervision, improving crisis management frameworks, and promoting greater transparency and disclosure.

The report also emphasizes the need for countries to work together to address global challenges, such as climate change, cybersecurity, and the ongoing digital transformation of the economy.

The IMF's warning is a timely reminder that the global economy remains vulnerable and that policymakers must remain vigilant and take appropriate action to ensure that the global economic recovery is sustainable and inclusive.

The ongoing tensions between China and the United States are affecting the interest of US companies’ investments in the Asian nation, Michael Hart, President of the American Chamber of Commerce in China (AmCham China), said. Earlier this month, AmCham China launched the 25th annual China Business Climate Survey (BCS) Report. The report highlighted a slightly pessimistic outlook for US companies in China, underpinned by the declining willingness of AmCham China members to increase investment in China.

The trade war and other disagreements have made business very challenging, with a majority of AmCham China’s more than 900 members no longer regarding China as a top-three investment priority, according to the latest survey findings by AmCham China.

The percentage of companies which see the “uncertainty of bilateral relations” as their leading challenge in China has risen to 66 percent. At the same time, the number of companies which think that China has become less welcoming to foreign companies has grown to 49 percent, the survey found.

Although trade between the two countries reached a record high of $690.6 billion in 2020, 66.4 percent of US imports from China and 58.3 percent of Chinese imports from the US are subjected to tariffs with little sign that either side will reduce the rates.

In addition, more US companies are looking to move their supply chains outside of China. However, China’s economic growth and the giant Chinese consumer market still make it a tempting prospect for US firms. AmCham China members include some of the most successful companies in the US, such as Nike, Intel, Pfizer and Coca-Cola.

Trade has been at the heart of the relationship between China and the US since President Deng Xiaoping opened up the country to foreign companies in December 1978.

Although corporate pessimism over the current state of the US-China relationship reflects a few tumultuous years, companies are also dealing with travel becoming more difficult, rising labour costs, executives who are “just not willing” to take up assignments in China, political pressure, and China becoming a less predictable place to do business.

According to Eswar Prasad, professor of global trade policy at Cornell University and former head of the International Monetary Fund’s China Division, the mutual dependence between China and the US has implications for the health of the entire global economy. China needs many products, especially technology products from the US, and the US has many companies that run their supply chains through China. If the US starts withdrawing from engagement with multilateral institutions, that does not bode well for global governance.

The souring US-China relationship also means that a growing number of US companies are looking at moving their supply chains outside of China. However, that will only have a limited impact on getting around the US-China tensions. Even if the US succeeds in building up an alternative supply chain, that alternative one will still largely depend on China. Those other countries will still rely on China for components, especially in industries such as green energy, medical technology and electronics. While firms are not shunning the South Asia nation altogether, they are trying to de-risk their supply chain, having more of a China plus one strategy and realising that they can no longer rely on the country.

While national security concerns between the two nations have led to a growing number of measures by the Biden administration to try and stop China from accessing US technology, including trying to limit new investments in the country by US companies, this comes against a backdrop of China still wanting US companies to invest in the nation.

The giant Chinese consumer market is probably the place where US firms remain the most optimistic, with McDonald’s, Starbucks and Ralph Lauren all having major Chinese expansion plans in the pipeline. It is hence still to be seen how the two leading economic superpowers of the world in the US and China resolve their ongoing issues and bring much-needed stability to the global economy.

More than 900 members of American Chamber of Commerce in China no longer regard China as a top-three investment priority

The percentage of companies which see the “uncertainty of bilateral relations” as their leading challenge in China has risen to 66 percent. At the same time, the number of companies which think that China has become less welcoming to foreign companies has grown to 49 percent, the survey found.

The ongoing tensions between China and the United States are affecting the interest of US companies’ investments in the Asian nation, Michael Hart, President of the American Chamber of Commerce in China (AmCham China), said. Earlier this month, AmCham China launched the 25th annual China Business Climate Survey (BCS) Report. The report highlighted a slightly pessimistic outlook for US companies in China, underpinned by the declining willingness of AmCham China members to increase investment in China.

The trade war and other disagreements have made business very challenging, with a majority of AmCham China’s more than 900 members no longer regarding China as a top-three investment priority, according to the latest survey findings by AmCham China.

The percentage of companies which see the “uncertainty of bilateral relations” as their leading challenge in China has risen to 66 percent. At the same time, the number of companies which think that China has become less welcoming to foreign companies has grown to 49 percent, the survey found.

Although trade between the two countries reached a record high of $690.6 billion in 2020, 66.4 percent of US imports from China and 58.3 percent of Chinese imports from the US are subjected to tariffs with little sign that either side will reduce the rates.

In addition, more US companies are looking to move their supply chains outside of China. However, China’s economic growth and the giant Chinese consumer market still make it a tempting prospect for US firms. AmCham China members include some of the most successful companies in the US, such as Nike, Intel, Pfizer and Coca-Cola.

Trade has been at the heart of the relationship between China and the US since President Deng Xiaoping opened up the country to foreign companies in December 1978.

Although corporate pessimism over the current state of the US-China relationship reflects a few tumultuous years, companies are also dealing with travel becoming more difficult, rising labour costs, executives who are “just not willing” to take up assignments in China, political pressure, and China becoming a less predictable place to do business.

According to Eswar Prasad, professor of global trade policy at Cornell University and former head of the International Monetary Fund’s China Division, the mutual dependence between China and the US has implications for the health of the entire global economy. China needs many products, especially technology products from the US, and the US has many companies that run their supply chains through China. If the US starts withdrawing from engagement with multilateral institutions, that does not bode well for global governance.

The souring US-China relationship also means that a growing number of US companies are looking at moving their supply chains outside of China. However, that will only have a limited impact on getting around the US-China tensions. Even if the US succeeds in building up an alternative supply chain, that alternative one will still largely depend on China. Those other countries will still rely on China for components, especially in industries such as green energy, medical technology and electronics. While firms are not shunning the South Asia nation altogether, they are trying to de-risk their supply chain, having more of a China plus one strategy and realising that they can no longer rely on the country.

While national security concerns between the two nations have led to a growing number of measures by the Biden administration to try and stop China from accessing US technology, including trying to limit new investments in the country by US companies, this comes against a backdrop of China still wanting US companies to invest in the nation.

The giant Chinese consumer market is probably the place where US firms remain the most optimistic, with McDonald’s, Starbucks and Ralph Lauren all having major Chinese expansion plans in the pipeline. It is hence still to be seen how the two leading economic superpowers of the world in the US and China resolve their ongoing issues and bring much-needed stability to the global economy.

US regulators have held a closed meeting of the Financial Stability Oversight Council to discuss banking sector conditions following the recent withdrawal of $98.4 billion of deposits by customers, with the bulk of the money coming from small banks.

While the withdrawals may have caused alarm, experts said the banking system is resilient and the withdrawals were due to economic uncertainty and lower interest rates.

The meeting on March 24 was attended by treasury secretary Janet Yellen, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell and other officials who were briefed on market developments by a New York Fed staff member.

Small banks' loss is big banks' gain

In a statement after the meeting, the council assured the public that the US banking system remains safe and resilient despite some institutions coming under stress.

They also discussed ongoing efforts to monitor financial developments and to improve the banking system's resilience to financial shocks. There were no other details provided on the meeting.

The withdrawals, 0.6 percent of the total, brought deposits down to just over $17.5 trillion. Deposits have been on a steady decline over the past year, falling $582.4 billion since February 2022, according to the Fed data released on the day. However, large institutions saw deposits increase by $67 billion, while smaller banks saw outflows of $120 billion.

Money market mutual funds, which offer higher yields compared to the lower interest rates offered by banks, have seen assets rise over the past two weeks, up $203 billion to $3.27 trillion, according to Investment Company Institute data through March 22.

This trend is not new and was observed during the financial crisis of 2008 when many investors moved their deposits from banks to money-market funds to minimise their risks.

The recent withdrawals from banks do not indicate a larger problem in the banking system. The Federal Reserve has taken measures to ensure that banks have enough cash on hand to weather any potential financial shocks. Banks' capital and liquidity buffers remain strong, which gives them the ability to withstand any unforeseen challenges.

Powell sought to assure the public earlier this week that the banking system is safe. He said deposit flows "have stabilised over the past week" following "powerful actions" from the Fed to backstop the system.

Banks have been flocking to emergency lending facilities set up after the failures of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank in recent weeks.

Data released on March 23 showed that institutions took a daily average of $116.1 billion of loans from the central bank's discount window, the highest since the financial crisis, and have taken out $53.7 billion from the Bank Term Funding Program.

'Deposits safe'

Powell reiterated that the Fed has the tools to protect depositors when there's a threat of serious harm to the economy or to the financial system, and that depositors should assume that their deposits are safe.

In conclusion, while the recent withdrawals from banks in the United States may have caused concern, experts agree that they do not indicate a larger problem in the banking system.

The American central bank has taken measures to ensure that banks have enough cash on hand to weather any potential financial shocks, and the banks' capital and liquidity buffers remain strong.

The recent withdrawals are a reflection of the current economic environment, characterised by rising interest rates and uncertainty. The Federal Reserve is also exploring ways to improve the banking system's resilience to financial shocks, including the introduction of a digital currency backed by the central bank.

Following close to $100 billion in deposit withdrawals, Jerome Powell reassures US banking system is safe

While the recent withdrawals from banks in the United States may have caused concern, experts agree that they do not indicate a larger problem in the banking system

US regulators have held a closed meeting of the Financial Stability Oversight Council to discuss banking sector conditions following the recent withdrawal of $98.4 billion of deposits by customers, with the bulk of the money coming from small banks.

While the withdrawals may have caused alarm, experts said the banking system is resilient and the withdrawals were due to economic uncertainty and lower interest rates.

The meeting on March 24 was attended by treasury secretary Janet Yellen, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell and other officials who were briefed on market developments by a New York Fed staff member.

Small banks' loss is big banks' gain

In a statement after the meeting, the council assured the public that the US banking system remains safe and resilient despite some institutions coming under stress.

They also discussed ongoing efforts to monitor financial developments and to improve the banking system's resilience to financial shocks. There were no other details provided on the meeting.

The withdrawals, 0.6 percent of the total, brought deposits down to just over $17.5 trillion. Deposits have been on a steady decline over the past year, falling $582.4 billion since February 2022, according to the Fed data released on the day. However, large institutions saw deposits increase by $67 billion, while smaller banks saw outflows of $120 billion.

Money market mutual funds, which offer higher yields compared to the lower interest rates offered by banks, have seen assets rise over the past two weeks, up $203 billion to $3.27 trillion, according to Investment Company Institute data through March 22.

This trend is not new and was observed during the financial crisis of 2008 when many investors moved their deposits from banks to money-market funds to minimise their risks.

The recent withdrawals from banks do not indicate a larger problem in the banking system. The Federal Reserve has taken measures to ensure that banks have enough cash on hand to weather any potential financial shocks. Banks' capital and liquidity buffers remain strong, which gives them the ability to withstand any unforeseen challenges.

Powell sought to assure the public earlier this week that the banking system is safe. He said deposit flows &quot;have stabilised over the past week&quot; following &quot;powerful actions&quot; from the Fed to backstop the system.

Banks have been flocking to emergency lending facilities set up after the failures of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank in recent weeks.

Data released on March 23 showed that institutions took a daily average of $116.1 billion of loans from the central bank's discount window, the highest since the financial crisis, and have taken out $53.7 billion from the Bank Term Funding Program.

'Deposits safe'

Powell reiterated that the Fed has the tools to protect depositors when there's a threat of serious harm to the economy or to the financial system, and that depositors should assume that their deposits are safe.

In conclusion, while the recent withdrawals from banks in the United States may have caused concern, experts agree that they do not indicate a larger problem in the banking system.

The American central bank has taken measures to ensure that banks have enough cash on hand to weather any potential financial shocks, and the banks' capital and liquidity buffers remain strong.

The recent withdrawals are a reflection of the current economic environment, characterised by rising interest rates and uncertainty. The Federal Reserve is also exploring ways to improve the banking system's resilience to financial shocks, including the introduction of a digital currency backed by the central bank.

Name		Price	Change	Change%
BA	Boeing	205.32	4.75	2.37
IBM	IBM	125.29	1.92	1.56
DOW	Dow Inc	52.73	0.73	1.40
CVX	Chevron	159.07	1.42	0.90
MMM	3M	102.17	0.68	0.67

Name		Price	Change	Change%
MSFT	Microsoft	272.07	-4.31	-1.56
AXP	American Express	161.17	-1.95	-1.20
AAPL	Apple	156.47	-1.81	-1.14
INTC	Intel	28.94	-0.24	-0.82
MRK	Merck & Co	106.27	-0.66	-0.62

Name		Price	Market Cap (in billion US $)
AAPL	Apple	156.47	2,475.66
MSFT	Microsoft	272.07	2,025.24
V	Visa	221.63	456.16
UNH	UnitedHealth	481.11	449.52
JNJ	J&J	152.98	399.96

Fund	AUM $	1 Y	3 Y	5 Y	Exp. Ratio
Franklin India Feeder - Franklin U.S. Opportunities Fund - Growth	2880.45	-14.76%	12.15%	11.33%	1.61
ICICI Prudential US Bluechip Equity Fund - Growth	2365.38	0.71%	19.04%	15.77%	2.2
ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund - Direct Plan - Growth	568.68	-7.26%	0%	0%	0.5
Bandhan US Equity Fund of Fund - Direct Plan - Growth	322.99	-5.5%	0%	0%	0.65
Nippon India US Equity Opportunities Fund - Growth	534.43	-10.05%	14.53%	12.44%	2.5
Aditya Birla Sun Life NASDAQ 100 FOF - Direct Plan - Growth	163.75	-5.5%	0%	0%	0.43
Motilal Oswal Nasdaq 100 ETF (MOSt Shares NASDAQ 100)	5356.12	-6.64%	21.02%	19.05%	0.58
DSP US Flexible Equity Fund - Direct Plan - Growth	770.53	-1.33%	23.19%	14.35%	1.52
Edelweiss US Technology Equity FOF - Growth	1723.27	-13.23%	18.13%	0%	2.35
Edelweiss US Value Equity Offshore Fund - Regular Plan - Growth	90.21	-1.86%	20.69%	11.2%	2.34

US Markets

20:31
Dow Jones 32,458.40 13.40 (0.04%)

20:17
Nasdaq 11,672.10 -96.73 (-0.82%)

20:31
S&P 500 3,969.16 -11.59 (-0.29%)

ADVANCE / DECLINE

Market Movers

Sector Performance

Market Map

Key Indicators

Economic Calendar

Invest in U.S funds

News

Boeing

IBM

Dow Inc

Chevron

3M

Microsoft

American Express

Apple

Intel

Merck & Co

Apple

Microsoft

Visa

UnitedHealth

J&J

US Markets

20:31 Dow Jones 32,458.40 13.40 (0.04%)

20:17 Nasdaq 11,672.10 -96.73 (-0.82%)

20:31 S&P 500 3,969.16 -11.59 (-0.29%)

ADVANCE / DECLINE

20:31
Dow Jones 32,458.40 13.40 (0.04%)

20:17
Nasdaq 11,672.10 -96.73 (-0.82%)

20:31
S&P 500 3,969.16 -11.59 (-0.29%)