Florida woman sues Hershey for missing Halloween carving from Reese's Peanut Butter Pumpkins

Hershey is facing legal action for false advertising on Reese's packaging. (Image: hersheyland.com)

Hershey, the confectionery giant, finds itself entangled in a legal battle as consumer from Florida, Cynthia Kelly, filed a lawsuit seeking damages of $5 million accusing the company of deceptive advertising practices.

The focal point of the dispute revolves around holiday-themed treats, including Reese's Peanut Butter Pumpkins, where Kelly contends that the actual product starkly deviates from the enticing portrayal on the packaging.

Kelly’s purchase of Reese's Peanut Butter Pumpkins came sans the pumpkin carving promised on the packaging leading to the company potentially facing a class-action suit, a trend in the food industry where several major brands have faced legal scrutiny for alleged false advertising.

Kelly's grievance stems from the stark contrast between the alluring imagery on Hershey's holiday-themed product packaging and the disappointing reality inside.

The lawsuit, filed in a federal court in Florida, not only singles out Reese's Peanut Butter Pumpkins but also extends its reach to other products like White Pumpkins, Pieces Pumpkins, Peanut Butter Ghost, and White Ghost.

According to the legal document, Kelly asserts that the absence of the detailed carvings, as prominently showcased on the product label, amounted to false representation.

The legal battle seeks class-action status, aiming to represent numerous consumers who, like Kelly, feel deceived by the vivid depictions on the packaging. Hershey, a heavyweight in the confectionery industry, has yet to comment on the lawsuit, CNN reported.

This legal saga places Hershey in the company of other food industry giants, including Taco Bell, Wendy’s, McDonald’s, Burger King, and Arby’s, all facing legal repercussions for alleged discrepancies between their advertisements and the actual products.

To substantiate false advertising claims, legal experts assert the necessity of proving that the advertisements could mislead a "reasonable consumer."