HomeNewsOpinionPolicy | If the ‘market knows’, why doesn’t the auditor?

Policy | If the ‘market knows’, why doesn’t the auditor?

Does the audit industry consider its responsibility towards a company’s stakeholders while writing out scripted audit reports? There needs to be a systemic focus on improving audit quality standards.

May 11, 2020 / 14:36 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Representative Image
Representative Image

Auditors are considered market fiduciaries, because they validate the fairness of financial statements. Resignation of auditors and frequent changes in auditors are considered early warning signals by most investors. The market frustration over the lack of accountability of the audit industry led to SEBI using its discretionary powers over market fiduciaries to regulate auditors. SAT overturning SEBI’s ban of PriceWaterhouse, legally tenable no doubt, misreads market expectations and leaves open the question of their accountability yet again.

Recently, the market has been raising pertinent questions over auditors given the recent controversies. IL&FS, CG Power and Industrial Solutions Limited, and Dewan Housing Finance Limited (DHFL) are just some of these instances. In these and in others as well, investors question the role of auditors in not being able to highlight financial shenanigans, which (post-facto) seemed obvious in some cases. Another frequent comment from investors is that audit reports are scripted, and most read similar to each other. Put differently, it is that audit reports don’t really differentiate between companies.

Story continues below Advertisement

The audit industry argues that the failures are isolated instances and that in aggregate, these ‘mishaps’ account for a very small share of the financial statements reviews by auditors. This no longer appears to hold. The financial implications of these ‘mishaps’ has been material starting from the Satyam fiasco — the first material event that raised questions on the role of the auditors — to IL&FS, to Vakrangee, to DHFL, to Fortis, to CG Power and to several more. These have impacted both banks and the average citizen: either through an overall impact on the economy or through the erosion of personal wealth.

In most instances, investors seemed to sniff out that something is amiss, well before a company’s auditors. This was being reflected in either a steadfast deterioration in the company’s stock price, or a systematic contraction in the company’s access to debt. Therefore, if the ‘market knows’ based on largely publicly available information, why are auditors — who have access to much better quality of internal information — unable to see the writing on the wall? Can what the ‘market knows’ be embedded into the audit process?