Heavily delayed—and even worse, completely stalled— housing projects continue to plague the country’s residential sector. Lakhs of homebuyers walk a treacherous path from booking a house to moving in, one that runs through several government offices, tribunals and courts. There are instances of parents waiting for their homes, while their children are all grown up, ready to buy a house of their own.
As many as 500,000 homes worth Rs 4.48 lakh crore are stuck across seven micro markets in the country, says an analysis by real estate consultancy Anarock. The Anarock report takes into account the markets that comprise metro cities. The National Capital Region (NCR) and Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR) together account for 77 percent of such projects. Pune had a 9 percent share of delayed projects, and Kolkata 5 percent. The southern metros of Bengaluru, Chennai, and Hyderabad together accounted for the remaining 9 percent. NCR has approximately 240,610 stuck or delayed units worth over Rs 1.81 lakh crore. MMR comes next with 128,870 units worth about Rs 1.84 lakh crore. Bengaluru has 26,030 units worth over Rs 28,072 crore that are running behind schedule. Hyderabad has some 11,450 such units worth over Rs 11,310 crore, while Chennai has the least number of stuck homes among the top 7 cities—5,190 units worth around Rs 3,731 crore.
Read More EXPLORE PROJECTSFinancial strain, labour challenges or outright siphoning of money, whatever the reason on part of the builder, it is homebuyers who find themselves saddled with EMIs and rents as they run around to get their promised homes. This list is not exhaustive. Here’s a look at some projects where buyers are still waiting for their homes:
Stalled projects are those with absolutely no construction activity, while delayed projects are those with minimal progress. To ensure that they do not incur further financial losses, homebuyers need to act immediately and seek legal recourse. Here's a look at what some buyers have to say.
Several homebuyers are upset with real estate developers for having delayed their projects. Many have paid 90-95 per cent for the flats.
Across Indian cities, buyers are waiting – for over a decade in some cases – for their dream homes after investing their life savings and taking bank loans. It’s been a treacherous path for them from the time they booked an apartment, a path that runs through government offices, tribunals and courts.
Many developers of delayed projects are facing a cash crunch because of financial indiscipline and diversion of funds. They are now finding it difficult to execute the projects that they had launched as the source of funds has dried up or funds are available at a high rate and that too only to select developers. This is what experts have to say.
Real estate, especially housing, is a nascent industry in India. From scrupulous first-time buyers, purchasing with borrowed money, housing became a base from speculators by 2005. The end user was edged out and investors made huge amounts of money tr...
CONTINUE READINGResidential real estate projects launched after the introduction of RERA are witnessing an average delay of 10-18 months, while the delay in projects launched prior to RERA, ranges from 20-48 months
In 1998 the first housing policy was envisaged to provide affordable and formal housing to urban Indians. So what went wrong and why are millions of Indians struggling to get the houses they paid for over a decade ago?
Proper execution of laws and availability of long-term capital are key to the growth of the real estate sector
Resale market seeing greater traction in Bengaluru and Chennai compared to Gurugram and Noida
Here's are some essential questions that homebuyers should ask before buying a house.
Upon getting the registration number of the project, the buyer/investor will be able to verify the same from the RERA portal and peruse the documents, plans and permissions, title certificate, encumbrance certificate, status of the project, track record/details of the past projects undertaken by the builder, etc. uploaded by the builder.
Upon getting a copy of the sanctioned layout plan, one can verify and understand the layout of the project as sanctioned by authorities vis-à-vis what is marketed by the builder and/or demonstrated in the brochure or other advertising material. The sanctioned floor plan can be perused to confirm whether the floor where the flat is situated is sanctioned by the authorities and the sanctioned area of the flat therein vis-à-vis what is being marketed and sold by the builder.
The timelines disclosed by the builder on the RERA portal will help the buyer plan his finances and make appropriate rental arrangements, if required. The buyer/investor can cross check the date of possession with the date of completion declared by the builder on the RERA portal, discuss the timing for payment of instalments and confirm if all the common area amenities and facilities will also be available on date of possession of the flat. The timelines will also help an investor plan his exit of the investment.
Upon understanding that the project is financed by a bank/financial institution, the buyer/investor can get comfort that there may be lower chances of delays on part of the builder in execution and completion on account of non-availability of finance.
Upon getting a copy of the booking form, the buyer/investor will get clarity about the terms of payment of the token amount or advance deposit, the further payments to be made by way of advances/instalments and the timelines to execute an agreement for sale. The buyer/ investor will also get a clear understanding about the consequences of not confirming the booking within the agreed timelines and the amount that may be deducted for such cancellation and the period within which the balance money shall be refunded. As per RERA a builder cannot demand more than 10 percent of the amount without executing an agreement for sale.
The buyer/investor should examine the booking form/allotment letter/agreement for sale thoroughly to confirm and verify the clauses in relation to investor/buyer liability to pay interest and penalties in case of delayed payments or breach of the terms/clauses of the executed documents or upon which events the builder can terminate the booking/allotment/agreement. In most of such documents, there is a provision for forfeiture of amounts under the head of administrative costs. All such aspects should be discussed and negotiated prior to executing any document.
On getting a statement of other costs and deposits, the buyer/investor will get clarity on the advance maintenance, deposits, society formation charges, club house fees payable over and above the consideration, GST, stamp duty and registration charges. Many times the agreement for sale also has clauses on escalating the consideration in case of certain eventualities such as increase in payment of development charges, levy of additional premiums and new taxes.
Prior to making further payments and entering into an agreement for sale with the builder, we advise that a buyer/investor should inspect the original documents, plans and permissions in respect of the project and thoroughly examine the agreement for sale to ensure that all the agreed terms are recorded in agreement for sale including possession date committed by builder, safeguards in case of delays/defaults/abandonment of project by builder, conveyance of the land and building in favour of society upon completion.
Authored by Heena Chheda, Partner, Economic Laws Practice.
Homebuyers should do proper due diligence about the developer and project before buying a house. It also makes sense to contact homebuyers who have already invested in the project where you are planning to book the apartment. If possible, try to stay away from under-construction projects, especially those running way behind schedule.
It is a telling story in India about the sheer number of housing units that are stalled or delayed. Heavily delayed – and even worse, completely stalled – housing projects (launched in 2014 or before) continue to plague the Indian residential se...
CONTINUE READINGAn under-construction property can offer flexibility in home design and attractive payment methods. But if things go wrong, you might just have to wait for years to get possession of your dream home
When a life time's savings are at stake, it makes sense to take that extra effort to gather all information regarding the developer's credibility
The failure of the real estate regulator in Haryana to give relief to homebuyers in the Green View project developed by a state-owned company is only one instance of its limitations and indifference.
This model of homebuyers taking over stuck projects is becoming popular and once some of the projects do get completed, it could become a test case for other projects to emulate
EXPERT SPEAK
The first option for homebuyers is to file a consumer complaint with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Authority (RERA) for delayed projects. The Authority will either assist them in obtaining a refund or will put pressure on the builder to expedite the project.
The corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) of the Corporate Debtor was conducted in a manner adhering to all rules and regulations and due timelines have been followed. The CoC approved resolution plan has been filed to the Hon’ble NCLT for their approval. Further, some of the objections have been filed against the CoC approved resolution plan. The Hon’ble NCLT will take up those applications for hearing along with resolution plan approval application
We have filed an insolvency case in the NCLT. Since 2020, due to COVID and other issues, the case is only getting new dates. Even an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) has not been appointed. The next hearing is likely in July where the court may go for an ex-parte order to appoint the IRP as no one is coming to represent the builder
Under the provisions of RERA Act, the RERA Court is empowered to hand over the project to the association of allottees. If they are capable of taking over the project en bloc, without any reference to the developer in terms of being able to collect the balance amounts from subscribers or allottees, and putting in place a mechanism whereby the existing third-party vendors can be deployed for a meaningful completion of the project, then that could be a feasible recourse
The GNIDA did not take any step for recovery of its payments from Earth Towne. The 10 percent rule was a complete fraud. You are approving the map to complete the project within three years and a maximum of five years. Say if the project was delivered to the buyers on time, how could the GNIDA wait for 10 years for recovery of the land cost? The builder would flee by then
Our legal team is working to take the case to a conclusion...It's a court-monitored project. The project will be delivered in phases. We will start delivery in two years and complete it in five years
Many people have paid almost 90 percent. The builder not only delayed the delivery but also levied arbitrary charges on homebuyers in violation of the Builder-Buyer Agreement
After the NCLT order, we applied to various authorities for approval. Of these, the GNIDA has filed a review of the order in the NCLT itself. The case is pending before the NCLT. The authority had to submit its claim before the resolution professional, which they did not do and now they want payment of their dues. The GNIDA has asked the tribunal not to pass a final order until a direction from the state government or from the Supreme Court to the GNIDA
The NCLT had accepted failure on the part of the developer and ordered insolvency. The company was declared insolvent in 2019 and the CIRP (corporate insolvency resolution process) commenced
Considering the financial situation, the chances of the developer completing the project in the near future appear to be bleak
Cases of delayed projects fall under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Section 17 deals with complaints regarding violation of consumer rights or unfair trade practices or false or misleading advertisements. Under the Consumer Protection Act, the builder should refund money to home buyers for delayed projects along with interest at the rate charged by a scheduled nationalised bank on home loans in the corresponding period
We’ve deposited the requisite fees for renewal of licences with DTCP, Haryana, and are expecting renewal of licences shortly. We’ve started work on phase-3 and phase-4 units where handing over of flats has already begun and more flats are scheduled to be handed over every week
We are towards the fag end of the corporate insolvency resolution process and are hopeful that the recent Supreme Court order stating that Noida Authority is an operational creditor will help us. It may be another five to six months before the successful resolution applicant is appointed by the NCLT. A total of Rs 250 crore would be required going forward to complete the remaining 1,700 units
The homebuyers of Lotus Panache have been able to not only find a resolution plan which meets their approval but facilitated the RP to continue the operations of the company as a going concern during the insolvency resolution process. The key in projects undergoing insolvency resolution is the collective strength of homebuyers
Most of the cases are getting delayed because of a difference in compensation/refund between the builder and the buyers. Though KRERA is speeding up the hearings, it will take some more months before we can find common ground