172@29@17@138!~!172@29@0@53!~!|news|india|medical-diplomacy-india-china-covid19-who-aid-a-responsible-global-leader-5410381.html!~!|controller|infinite_scroll_article.php
Moneycontrol
Financial Freedom Offer: Subscribe to Moneycontrol Pro and grab benefits worth ₹15,000/-
you are here: HomeNewsIndia
Last Updated : Jun 16, 2020 10:00 AM IST | Source: Moneycontrol.com

Medical Diplomacy | India underlines its credentials as a responsible global leader

India’s response to other countries’ needs during the COVID-19 pandemic becomes noteworthy when compared to ‘wolf warrior diplomacy’ exhibited by China

Moneycontrol Contributor @moneycontrolcom
Representative Image
Representative Image

Harsh V Pant and Anant Singh Mann 

Even as India grapples with massive losses in lives and livelihoods because of COVID-19, its global outreach has continued to be proactive and substantive.

As soon as the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 contagion as a ‘pandemic’ on March 11, New Delhi lost no time in organising  a video conference with the member states of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) to coordinate regional preparations to deal with the impending disaster. India offered $10 million for a voluntary emergency fund to be used by the SAARC nations in case of a scarcity of essentials; in total, the member states raised $26.1 million for the fund.

Close

Thereafter, New Delhi maintained this momentum of promoting international policy coordination and engagement by participating in a variety of virtual meetings: one with the Indo-Pacific countries on March 20; another one with member states of the G-20 on March 26; and later in April, interactions with foreign ministers of BRICS nations.

One particular area of India’s global imprint in this time of COVID-19 is its medical diplomacy. Indeed, India enjoys a high profile as a provider of pharmaceutical and other medical commodities that are critical in the global battle against the pandemic. Within SAARC alone, as of June 3, India has supplied aid worth Rs 15.7 crore: this is in the form of medical aid (Rs 11.71 crore); Information Exchange Programme (Rs 41 lakh); and food supplies to the Maldives (Rs 3.58 crore).

Beyond its immediate neighbours, India has also provided extensive aid to other nations worth some Rs 32 crore (which includes transport costs of Rs 9.7 crore) — this comprises 72 percent of its committed aid as of June 3. Furthermore, Procurement Orders of approximately Rs 60 crore have been issued to supply aid in the form of drugs, testing kits and other medical assistance to Myanmar, Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) states, and 12 countries in the African continent.

The drugs being supplied as aid by India to other countries are primarily paracetamol (PCM) tablets and the much-talked about COVID-19 prophylaxis, Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) tablets. India has already supplied PCM tablets to 10 of the 30 countries it has made a commitment to, and aims to provide a total of 3.18 million tablets worth an estimated Rs 30 lakh. While experts are still deliberating whether HCQ indeed works, it currently stands as the closest preventive drug for the infectious disease. India’s help in this regard is therefore crucial.

More pertinently, the Indian Pharmaceutical Alliance (IPA) estimates that India has the capacity to produce around 40 tonnes of HCQ per month, which is around 70 percent of the world’s total supply. Already, India has supplied 2.945 million HCQ tablets worth Rs 1.031 crore to 24 countries through grants. A further five million HCQ tablets worth Rs 1.75 crore have been approved for 28 LAC states, and another 1.9 million HCQ tablets valued at Rs 0.665 crore for 19 African states. In total, India is committed to provide some 10 million HCQ tablets to 76 countries across the globe.

Further, India has been providing technical assistance in the form of dispatching Rapid Response Teams to countries such as Kuwait and the Maldives, and has set up platforms to exchange information. India has also organised e-ITEC training programmes for healthcare professionals under the aegis of the country’s reputed medical colleges such as the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) in Delhi and the Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGI) in Chandigarh.

As of June 3, the cumulative amount of COVID-19-related aid that India is looking to extend is in the range of Rs 110-120 crore (inclusive of transport costs) across over 90 countries. The data shows that India has been steadfast in providing unconditional humanitarian assistance to many countries across the world, quietly and without the accompanying fanfare. These recipients include countries such as China (worth Rs 6.1 crore) and Nepal (Rs 4.07 crore), with which India’s ties have been strained in recent weeks.

Indeed, India’s response to other countries’ needs amidst the pandemic becomes even more noteworthy when compared to that of countries such as China, for example, whose COVID-19 aid diplomacy is being discussed extensively. To begin with, China has received heavy criticisms for its delayed response to the outbreak, plausibly allowing the contagion to spread rapidly well beyond its borders. To counter the international censure, Beijing adopted a new strategy, referred to by analysts as ‘wolf warrior diplomacy’, in which it is using all means necessary to control the international narrative about the pandemic, its roots and its future. It is this motive that has driven Beijing’s COVID-19-related aid.

It takes every opportunity to publicise its assistance to countries such as Cambodia, Serbia, France and Italy, among others. At the same time, however, there are reports of defective testing kits having been supplied to countries such as the Netherlands and India. More pertinently, China’s aid campaign appears to be capitalising on the global health crisis, as it seeks to revive its ‘Health Silk Road’ (HSR) project that was initially an auxiliary of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). China, through its aid is seizing the opportunity and portraying itself as a responsible leader in public health governance. It is possibly even offering its HSR model as an alternative to the ailing WHO. Worryingly, the HSR model, based on the BRI framework, replaces the WHO’s traditional multilateral structure with that of a ‘hub and spoke’ structure, with China at the centre.

Some might argue that India is punching above its weight with its interventions in the early stages of the outbreak. Yet, notwithstanding the weaknesses in India’s largely inherited colonial structures, and its scarcity of resources as a developing nation, it has championed international engagement and provided vital aid on a multinational scale at a time when global-isolationist forces have been at their most powerful.

India has looked beyond its self-interests at a time when most states had either begun checking their exports to limit the outflow of essential commodities or started manoeuvring to profit from the pandemic. Despite itself facing natural calamities such as cyclones and locust swarms, coupled with the unabated spiking of COVID-19 cases across the country, India is underlining its credentials as a responsible global stakeholder, delivering results when they are most needed.

(This article first appeared in ORF)

Harsh V Pant is director, Studies at Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi and professor of international relations, King’s College London. Anant Singh Mann is a research intern at ORF. Views are personal.
First Published on Jun 16, 2020 09:54 am
Sections