Moneycontrol PRO
you are here: HomeNewsIndia

Bombay HC quashes FIRs against foreigners who attended Tablighi Jamaat congregation

The Bombay High Court said there was big propaganda in the media against foreigners attending the Tablighi Jamaat congregation, and an attempt was made to create a picture that they were responsible for spreading COVID-19 in India

August 22, 2020 / 02:57 PM IST

Observing that “the Maharashtra Police acted mechanically”, the Bombay High Court on August 21 quashed First Information Reports (FIRs) against foreign nationals who attended the Tablighi Jamaat congregation in Delhi’s Nizamuddin area in March, amid the novel coronavirus pandemic.

The Aurangabad bench comprising Justices TV Nalawade and MG Sewlikar said it appeared that the state government “acted under political compulsion” and the “police also did not dare to exercise powers given to them under provisions of procedural laws and substantive laws”.

“A political government tries to find the scapegoat when there is pandemic or calamity and the circumstances show that there is probability that these foreigners were chosen to make them scapegoats,” The Hindu quoted the bench as saying.

In its judgement, the court said the allegations levelled against these foreign nationals were “very vague in nature”. It also said, "From these allegations inference is not possible at any stage that they were spreading Islam religion and there was intention of conversion. The government cannot give different treatment to citizens of different religions of different countries.”

The High Court was hearing a petition filed by 29 foreign nationals who were booked under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Epidemic Diseases Act, Maharashtra Police Act, Disaster Management Act and Foreigner's Act for allegedly violating tourist visa conditions by attending the congregation.


COVID-19 Vaccine

Frequently Asked Questions

View more
How does a vaccine work?

A vaccine works by mimicking a natural infection. A vaccine not only induces immune response to protect people from any future COVID-19 infection, but also helps quickly build herd immunity to put an end to the pandemic. Herd immunity occurs when a sufficient percentage of a population becomes immune to a disease, making the spread of disease from person to person unlikely. The good news is that SARS-CoV-2 virus has been fairly stable, which increases the viability of a vaccine.

How many types of vaccines are there?

There are broadly four types of vaccine — one, a vaccine based on the whole virus (this could be either inactivated, or an attenuated [weakened] virus vaccine); two, a non-replicating viral vector vaccine that uses a benign virus as vector that carries the antigen of SARS-CoV; three, nucleic-acid vaccines that have genetic material like DNA and RNA of antigens like spike protein given to a person, helping human cells decode genetic material and produce the vaccine; and four, protein subunit vaccine wherein the recombinant proteins of SARS-COV-2 along with an adjuvant (booster) is given as a vaccine.

What does it take to develop a vaccine of this kind?

Vaccine development is a long, complex process. Unlike drugs that are given to people with a diseased, vaccines are given to healthy people and also vulnerable sections such as children, pregnant women and the elderly. So rigorous tests are compulsory. History says that the fastest time it took to develop a vaccine is five years, but it usually takes double or sometimes triple that time.

View more

According to Live Law, the court also said there was “big propaganda” in the media against the foreigners who had come to Markaz in Delhi and “an attempt was made to create a picture that these foreigners were responsible for spreading COVID-19 virus in India. There was virtually persecution against these foreigners”.

Reminding authorities about the Indian philosophy “Atithi Devo Bhava (guest is our God)”, the bench said “more tolerance” and sensitivity should have been shown towards the “guests particularly like the present petitioners” especially during the pandemic.

“The allegations made show that instead of helping them we lodged them in jails by making allegations that they are responsible for violation of travel documents, they are responsible for spreading of virus etc.”

The circumstances and the latest COVID-19 infection figures in India show that such action against present petitioners should not have been taken, the court said.

It also asked authorities “to repent about this action” and take “some positive steps” to repair the damage that has been done.
Moneycontrol News
first published: Aug 22, 2020 02:56 pm
ISO 27001 - BSI Assurance Mark