HomeNewsBusinessMarketsSEBI bars Droneacharya, promoters for two years over fraudulent disclosures, IPO fund diversion

SEBI bars Droneacharya, promoters for two years over fraudulent disclosures, IPO fund diversion

SEBI has alleged misuse of IPO proceeds, inflated financials, and misleading corporate disclosures aimed at propping up the company’s share price.

November 28, 2025 / 21:51 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
SEBI bars Droneacharya, promoters for two years over fraudulent disclosures, IPO fund diversion
SEBI bars Droneacharya, promoters for two years over fraudulent disclosures, IPO fund diversion

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has barred Droneacharya Aerial Innovations Ltd (DAIL), its promoters and key advisers from accessing the securities market for up to two years after an investigation uncovered alleged misuse of IPO proceeds, inflated financials, and misleading corporate disclosures aimed at propping up the company’s share price. Monetary penalties totalling Rs 75 lakh have also been imposed on six entities.

Droneacharya, listed on the BSE SME platform since December 2022, is engaged in drone-training services, drone supply and maintenance, and consultancy operations. SEBI’s investigation, covering FY 2022–23 and FY 2023–24, found that the company and its top management, Managing Director Prateek Srivastava and CFO-director Nikita Srivastava, engaged in practices that “fraudulently induced investor interest” post listing.

Story continues below Advertisement

According to the order, the company issued misleading and false corporate announcements to generate demand for its shares and arrest a decline in price, enabling pre-IPO investors to exit at favourable valuations. Quasi-Judicial Authority Santosh Shukla in his order noted that, “post listing of IPO of DAIL, made misleading and false corporate announcements to induce interests to buy shares of DAIL to create demand for shares of DAIL and also to maintain the otherwise falling price so that the pre- IPO investors could exit at a better price.”

The regulator found the company deviated from its stated IPO objects without obtaining shareholders’ approval and misrepresented the utilisation of funds in its disclosures. Quasi-Judicial Authority, Santosh Shukla, in his order further stated, “they inflated revenues and profits and artificially maintained the price of the shares of DAIL which enabled the pre-IPO investors to exit at commensurate price, the chances for which, in normal course, were bleak. Further, the IPO proceeds were mis-utilised and they had deviated from the objects clause of the IPO stated in the prospectus and have not taken the shareholders’ approval for the deviation.”