Moneycontrol PRO
Open App

Zee-Invesco court war: Division bench adjourns hearing, no date given so far

Division bench of Bombay HC had first heard the matter on October 29, after Zee’s largest shareholder Invesco and OFI Global approached the bench, challenging an October 26 Bombay High Court ruling by justice Gautam Patel.

November 30, 2021 / 04:48 PM IST
ZEEL | Representative image

ZEEL | Representative image


The division bench of the Bombay High Court headed by Justice SJ Kathawalla and Milind Jadhav adjourned the hearing on the Zee Entertainment and Invesco matter on November 30.

Next date of hearing is yet to be given.

Janak Dwarkadas, counsel appearing for OFI Global China Fund that along with Invesco holds 17.88 percent stake in Zee, argued that requisition for extraordinary general meeting (EGM) is valid as it satisfies numerical and procedural requirement.

On November 29, he had said that the Bombay High Court bench had earlier suggested that even a single shareholder can block a requisition if he feels it is invalid.
He had also said that Zee hijacked National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) proceedings by filing a suit before Bombay HC.


"NCLT has the jurisdiction to decide on the requisition for an extraordinary general meeting (EGM)," Dwarkadas had added.


The matter had first come up for hearing on October 29, after Zee’s largest shareholder Invesco and OFI Global approached the bench, challenging an October 26 Bombay High Court ruling by justice Gautam Patel.


Judge Patel had granted an injunction against Invesco’s call for an EGM on October 26. The court had observed that directing Zee to call an EGM would be potentially non-compliant. It said that there was a fundamental flaw in Invesco’s construct.


On the Bombay HC order, Dwarkadas said that the court's judgement to give injunction against requisition will have far reaching impact. "Court cannot injunct a meeting as it is a statutory right of a shareholder with 1/10 share capital," he added.


Law which was well settled has been unsettled with Zee’s injunction, said Dwarkadas.

Justice Patel in his October 26 order had said, “In the scheme of the Companies Act, shareholders do not get to choose individual independent directors. They may only demand that there be independent directors.”

Close

On Invesco seeking removal of Punit Goenka as the MD and CEO of the company, Patel said: “The requisition demands his ouster — but without proposing a replacement. This puts Zee into a statutory blackhole, for it would then be totally in violation of Section 203(1); and it, and its directors, would have to face the liabilities, including fines, set out in Section 203(5).”

Moneycontrol News
Tags: #Companies
first published: Nov 30, 2021 04:44 pm
Sections
ISO 27001 - BSI Assurance Mark