you are here:

UPL Ltd.

BSE: 512070 | NSE: UPL |

Represents Equity.Intra - day transactions are permissible and normal trading is done in this category
Series: EQ | ISIN: INE628A01036 | SECTOR: Chemicals

BSE Live

Sep 27, 16:00
728.00 8.45 (1.17%)
Volume
AVERAGE VOLUME
5-Day
216,669
10-Day
200,192
30-Day
155,237
139,640
  • Prev. Close

    719.55

  • Open Price

    723.00

  • Bid Price (Qty.)

    725.90 (26)

  • Offer Price (Qty.)

    728.00 (15)

NSE Live

Sep 27, 15:59
725.85 7.20 (1.00%)
Volume
AVERAGE VOLUME
5-Day
2,385,696
10-Day
2,337,379
30-Day
2,373,629
2,611,791
  • Prev. Close

    718.65

  • Open Price

    722.95

  • Bid Price (Qty.)

    725.85 (402)

  • Offer Price (Qty.)

    0.00 (0)

Annual Report

For Year :
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011

Auditor's Report

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of United Phosphorus Limited (the Company) as at March 31, 2010 and also the Profit and Loss account and the cash flow statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. 2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. 3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order. 4. Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note No. 14 of Schedule T to the financial statements. As per legal advice obtained in relation to the Court order, the Company has not adjusted tax benefit in respect of the amortization of the Product Registrations and Product Acquisitions to the reserves, as explained therein. 5. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that: i. We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit; ii. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books; iii. The balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account; iv. In our opinion, the balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956. v. On the basis of the written representations received from the directors, as on March 31, 2010, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2010 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956. vi. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India; a) In the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2010; b) In the case of the profit and loss account, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and c) In the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date. ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS REPORT Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date Re: United Phosphorus Limited (the Company) (i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets. (b) As explained to us, some of the Fixed Assets have been verified by the management, under phased programme of physical verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. The frequency of verification is reasonable and no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification. (c) There was no substantial disposal of fixed assets during the year. (ii) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals during the year. (b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business. (c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification carried out at the end of the year. (iii) (a) The Company has granted loan to two parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year was Rs 13,625 lakhs and the year- end balance of loans granted to such parties was Nil. (b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions for such loans are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company. (c) In respect of loans granted, repayment of the principal amount is as stipulated and payment of interest have been regular. (d) There is no overdue amount of loans granted to companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. (e) As informed, the Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, clauses 4(iii)(f) and 4(iii)(g) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order 2003 (as amended) are not applicable. (iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, no major weakness has been noticed in the internal control system in respect of these areas. During the course of audit, we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal control system of the Company. (v) (a) According to the information and explanations provided by the management, we are of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Act that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301 have been so entered. (b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are reasonable having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time, except in respect of certain transactions of purchases and sales of goods, materials or services, we are unable to comment in respect thereof in the absence of similar transactions with other parties. (vi) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public. (vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business. (viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under section 209(1 )(d) of the Companies Act, 1956, and are of the opinion that prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. (ix) (a) The Company is regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, or employees state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and material statutory dues applicable to it, though there has been a slight delay in a few cases. Further, since the Central Government has till date not prescribed the amount of cess payable under section 441A of the Companies Act,1956, we are not in a position to comment upon the regularity or otherwise of the company in depositing the same. (b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees state insurance, income-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, sales- tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and other undisputed statutory dues were outstanding, at the year end, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable. (c) According to the records of the Company, the dues outstanding of income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty and cess on account of any dispute, are as follows: Sr.Name of the statute Nature of Amount No. dues (Rs. In lacs) 1 Income Tax Act, 1961 Income-tax 6.13 demands 2 Sales Tax Act Sales tax 800.34 demands 3 Central Excise Act/ Excise duty/ 5,469.77 Finance Act Service tax demands 4 Customs Act Custom duty 2,331.00 demands 5 Foreign Trade Fiscal penalty 3,348.00 (Development and regulation ) Act Name of the Period to Forum where dispute is statute which the Pending amount related Income Tax Act, 1961 1996-97 & Income-tax Appellate Tribunal 1997-98 Sales Tax Act 1997-98 to Ahmedabad High Court, 2005-06 Commissioner of Sales-tax, Baroda & Sales Tax Tribunal, Ahmedabad Central Excise Act/ 1989-90 to Commissioner (Appeals) Finance Act 2008-09 Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Customs Act 1992-93 to Commissioner (Appeals) 1995-96 Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Foreign Trade 1992 to Bombay High Court 1997 (x) The Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and immediately preceding financial year. (xi) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial institution, bank or debenture holders. (xii) Based on our examination of documents and records, we are of the opinion that the Company has maintained adequate records where the Company has granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. (xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi /mutual benefit fund/society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) are not applicable to the Company. (xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) are not applicable to the Company. (xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has given guarantee for loans taken by others from bank or financial institutions, the terms and conditions whereof in our opinion are not prima-facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company. (xvi) Based on information and explanations given to us by the management, term loans were applied for the purpose for which the loans were obtained. (xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investment. (xviii)The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties or companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. (xix) According to the information and explanations given to us, during the period covered by our audit report, the Company has created security or charge in respect of debentures issued. (xx) The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the year. (xxi) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per the information and explanations given by the management, we report that no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit. For S.V. GHATALIA & ASSOCIATES Firm Registration No. 103162W Chartered Accountants (Per Sudhir Soni) Mumbai Partner 29th April, 2010 Membership No. 41870