Moneycontrol
Get App
SENSEX NIFTY
you are here:

Taneja Aerospace and Aviation Ltd.

BSE: 522229 | NSE: TANEJAERO | Series: | ISIN: INE692C01020 | SECTOR: Miscellaneous

BSE Live

Apr 01, 16:00
14.75 -0.50 (-3.28%)
Volume
AVERAGE VOLUME
5-Day
8,778
10-Day
19,264
30-Day
15,808
2,272
  • Prev. Close

    15.25

  • Open Price

    15.00

  • Bid Price (Qty.)

    0.00 (0)

  • Offer Price (Qty.)

    0.00 (0)

NSE Live

(%)
Volume
No Data Available
  • Prev. Close

  • Open Price

  • Bid Price (Qty.)

    ()

  • Offer Price (Qty.)

    ()

Taneja Aerospace and Aviation is not listed on NSE

Annual Report

For Year :
2018 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009

Auditor's Report

1. We have examined the attached Balance Sheet of Taneja Aerospace and Aviation Limited (the company) as at 31st March 2010 and also the Profit and Loss account and Cash-flow Statement of the Company for the period 1st July 2009 to 31st March 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. 2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the accounting standards generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the Management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. 3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order to the extent applicable. 4. Further to our comment in the Annexure referred to above, we report that: 4.1 As detailed in Note No. 17 of Schedule 15 of Notes on Accounts, ?The Company has transferred Rs. 12,97,08,425/- from the Reserve for Business Restructuring to the Profit and Loss Account. The company has adjusted excess of liabilities over assets of Rs 9,11,84,896/- of TAAL Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (TTPL) transferred as a result of merger, against the above credit. -The Company has transferred Rs. 12,38,88,545/- of revaluation reserve to general reserve. Both the above adjustments were done through the scheme of Amalgamation approved by the honorable High Court. 4.2 As detailed in note no. 17 of schedule 15 of Notes on Accounts the company invested Rs 10,00,50,000/- in TTPL which became subsidiary of the company during the period. The company proposed amalgamation of the said company with retrospective effect from 1st April 2008. We are unable to comment on the rational of this merger provided by the management in note no. 17. 4.3 Evidence provided in respect of quantity and valuation of inventory is inadequate. 5. Subject to our comments in paragraph 4.2 & 4.3 above and our comments in the annexed report, (a) We have obtained all the information and explanation, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit; (b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books; (c) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by our report are in agreement with the books of account. (d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with the report comply with Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956. (e) On the basis of written representations received from the Directors as on March 31, 2010 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the Directors is disqualified as on 31st March 2010 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956; (f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanation given to us, the said accounts, read with the schedules thereto and the notes thereon give information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required except as mentioned in clause 4 and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India; i. In the case of Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2010. ii. in the case of Profit and Loss account, of the Loss for the period ended on that date; and iii. In the case of Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the period ended on that date. ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS REPORT (Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date) (i) a The company maintains the Fixed Asset Register disclosing all the required particulars. b. According to the information provided and explanation given to us, the physical verification of the fixed assets was undertaken by the management and the discrepancies noticed as informed to us were not material, the provision for impairment made in the previous financial year is sufficient to cover such discrepancies. c. According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not disposed off major part of fixed asset during the period under audit, which would affect the going concern of the company. (ii) a. The company has produced stock audit report for physical verification for the period under audit, which has been used as basis. b. The company has valued its inventory of raw material, stores and work in progress at cost / realizable value. The company has written off inventory based on managements estimates as referred to in Note No. 17. (iii) In respect of unsecured loans granted to companies covered in register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and according to the information and explanation given to us- a. During the year, the Company has not granted any fresh advances to company/companies covered in the register (maintained under section 301) of the Companies Act, 1956. Out of advances granted in earlier years, the amount outstanding as on 31st March, 2010 is Rs.449 lacs. b. As explained to us, the advance is repayable on demand. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions on which advance have been granted to companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the company. c. As the advance is repayable on demand, we are unable to comment on regularity of receipt of principal and interest amount. d. No loan or interest can be termed as overdue in absence of time of repayment and thus the question of taking reasonable step for recovery of principal amount and interest there on dose not arise. e. During the year, the Company has taken advances aggregating to Rs.1149 lacs from one of the companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Previous year Rs.3160 lacs). At the year end, the aggregate amount outstanding was Rs. 705 lacs (Previous year Rs.995 lacs). The maximum balance outstanding during the year is Rs.1490 lacs (Previous year Rs.1511 lacs). f. As explained to us, the advance is repayable on demand. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of advance taken by the company; are prima facie not prejudicial to the interest of the company; g. As the advance is repayable on demand, we are unable to comment on the regularity of repayment of principal and interest amount. (iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, internal control in stores, purchase procedure and in accounting of revenue of the company needs to be strengthened. (v) a) According to the information and explanations given to us and to the best of our knowledge and belief, we are of the opinion that the transactions that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been so entered. b) In our opinion and according to explanations given to us, transactions made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the companies act, 1956 and exceeding the value of Rupees five lakhs have been made at prices which are reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant time subject to our comments contained in clause (iii) (b). (vi) As per explanation given to us, the company has not accepted any deposits from public to which the provisions of Section 58A and 58AA of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 would apply. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4 (vi) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company. (vii) The company appointed a firm of Chartered Accountants as their internal auditor and audit report was received for the nine month period ended 31st December, 2009 only for one of the division. Further the extent of internal audit needs to be strengthened to bring it in line with size and structure of the organization and complexities of the operation. (viii) The Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of the cost record u/s 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and hence the provisions of clause 4 (viii) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company. (ix) a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has been generally regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, income-tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues with the appropriate authorities during the period under review. b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of income tax, wealth tax, sales tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues, were in arrears, as at 31st March 2010, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable, except Name of Nature of Dues Amount Period to Statute (Rs. In Lacs) which it relates Chapter V of Service Tax (Self July09 to Finance Act, 1994 Assessment Tax) 67.24 Mar10 c) According to the explanation and information given to us, there are no dues of income tax/sales tax/wealth tax/service tax/custom duty/excise duty/cess which have not been deposited on account of any dispute. (x) The company does not have any accumulated losses. The company has not incurred any cash losses during the period covered by our audit and in the immediately preceding financial year. (xi) According to the records of the company examined by us and the information and explanation given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues of any financial institutions or bank. The company is paying the interest on the Bank Loans that have been computed and provided in the accounts based on restructuring scheme as approved by banks subject to continuance of compliance of conditions of scheme. (xii) According to the explanations given to us, the company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. (xiii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/mutual benefit fund/society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4 (xiii) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company. (xiv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4 (xiv) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company. (xv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank or financial institution. Hence, the provisions of clause 4 (xv) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company. (xvi) As per the information and explanations given to us, during the period the company has not taken over any Term Loan. (xvii) According to information and explanation given to us, and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the company, we report that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investment. (xviii) According to information and explanation given to us, during the period covered by our audit report, the company has not made preferential allotment of equity shares to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. (xix) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not issued any secured debentures during the period of our audit. Therefore, clause 4 (xix) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 is not applicable to the company. (xx) The company has disclosed the end use of the funds raised through preferential issue by way of notes to accounts. (xxi) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit. For Haresh Upendra & Co Chartered Accountants Haresh B. Shah Partner Pune, August 30, 2010 Membership No. : 32208