Moneycontrol
Get App
SENSEX NIFTY
you are here:

Nava Bharat Ventures Ltd.

BSE: 513023 | NSE: NBVENTURES |

Represents Equity.Intra - day transactions are permissible and normal trading is done in this category
Series: EQ | ISIN: INE725A01022 | SECTOR: Diversified

Success
Alert
Please select a Day.
Info

BSE Live

Feb 24, 16:00
68.05 -1.95 (-2.79%)
Volume
AVERAGE VOLUME
5-Day
4,226
10-Day
7,821
30-Day
19,112
3,077
  • Prev. Close

    70.00

  • Open Price

    69.10

  • Bid Price (Qty.)

    0.00 (0)

  • Offer Price (Qty.)

    0.00 (0)

NSE Live

Feb 24, 15:59
67.90 -2.10 (-3.00%)
Volume
AVERAGE VOLUME
5-Day
52,174
10-Day
60,014
30-Day
187,630
46,113
  • Prev. Close

    70.00

  • Open Price

    69.10

  • Bid Price (Qty.)

    0.00 (0)

  • Offer Price (Qty.)

    67.90 (72)

Annual Report

For Year :
2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

Auditor's Report

Report on the Standalone Financial Statements

1. We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of Nava Bharat Ventures Limited (‘the Company’), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31 March 2018, the Statement of Profit and Loss (including Other Comprehensive Income), the Cash Flow Statement and the Statement of Changes in Equity for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management’s Responsibility for the Standalone Financial Statements

2. The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (‘the Act’) with respect to the preparation of these standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view of the state of affairs (financial position), profit or loss (financial performance including other comprehensive income), cash flows and changes in equity of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Indian Accounting Standards (‘Ind AS’) specified under Section 133 of the Act. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s Responsibility

3. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone financial statements based on our audit.

4. We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder.

5. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether these standalone financial statements are free from material misstatement.

6. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial controls relevant to the Company’s preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company’s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

7. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on these standalone financial statements.

Opinion

8. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India including Ind AS specified under Section 133 of the Act, of the state of affairs (financial position) of the Company as at 31 March 2018, and its profit (financial performance including other comprehensive income), its cash flows and the changes in equity for the year ended on that date.

Other Matter

9. The standalone financial statements of the Company as at and for the year ended 31 March 2017 were audited by the Company’s predecessor auditor who had expressed an unmodified opinion on those standalone financial statements vide their report dated 27 May 2017. The balances as at 31 March 2017 as per the audited standalone financial statements, duly read in conjunction with note 40 to the financial statements, have been considered as opening balances for the purpose of these standalone financial statements.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

10. As required by the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2016 (‘the Order’) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 143(11) of the Act, we give in the Annexure I a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

11. Further to our comments in Annexure I, as required by Section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:

a) we have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

c) the standalone financial statements dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

d) in our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with Ind AS specified under Section 133 of the Act;

e) on the basis of the written representations received from the directors and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 March 2018 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164(2) of the Act;

f) we have also audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting (IFCoFR) of the Company as on 31 March 2018 in conjunction with our audit of the standalone financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date and our report dated May 30, 2018 as per Annexure II expressed an unmodified opinion;

g) with respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor’s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 (as amended), in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. the Company, as detailed in Note 34 to the standalone financial statements, has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position;

ii. the Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses;

iii. there has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company;

iv. the disclosure requirements relating to holdings as well as dealings in specified bank notes were applicable for the period from 8 November 2016 to 30 December 2016 which are not relevant to these standalone financial statements. Hence, reporting under this clause is not applicable.

Based on the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting a true and fair view on the financial statements of the Company and taking into consideration the information and explanations given to us and the books of account and other records examined by us in the normal course of audit, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, we report that:

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) The fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during the year and no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification. In our opinion, the frequency of verification of the fixed assets is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets.

(c) The title deeds of all the immovable properties (which are included under the head ‘Property, plant and equipment’) are held in the name of the Company except for the following properties which were transferred as a result of amalgamation of companies in earlier years wherein the title deeds are in the name of the erstwhile companies/Entities:

Nature of property

Total Number of Cases

Whether leasehold / freehold

Gross block as on 31 March 2018 (Rs. in Lakhs)

Net block on 31 March 2018 (Rs. in Lakhs)

Remarks

Land

Multiple

Freehold

232.31

232.31

-

The title deeds of the land on which buildings of sugar manufacturing facility representing a gross block of Rs.1,409.78 lakhs and net block of Rs.1,230.96 lakhs as on 31 March 2018 situated at Samalkot, East Godavari district are not held in the name of the Company, owing to the expiry of lease period of the land on 12 August 1996, on which the same are constructed.

(ii) In our opinion, the management has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals during the year and no material discrepancies between physical inventory and book records were noticed on physical verification.

(iii) The Company has granted unsecured loans to companies covered in the register maintained under Section 189 of the Act; and with respect to the same

(a) in our opinion the terms and conditions of grant of such loans are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the Company’s interest.

(b) the schedule of repayments of principal and interest has been stipulated wherein in respect of loan granted to one party, the principal and interest amounts are repayable on demand and since the repayment of principal has not been demanded, in our opinion, repayment of the principal amount is regular. Further, the repayment of interest amounts in respect of the said loan is regular. In respect of the other party, the schedule of repayments of interest and principal has been stipulated and as the interest and principal amounts were not due for payments during the year, the repayment of interest and principal amounts are regular.

(c) there is no overdue amount in respect of loans granted to such companies.

(iv) In our opinion, the Company has complied with the provisions of Sections 185 and 186 of the Act in respect of loans, investments, guarantees and security.

(v) In our opinion, the Company has not accepted any deposits within the meaning of Sections 73 to 76 of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014 (as amended). Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(v) of the Order are not applicable.

(vi) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under sub-section (1) of Section 148 of the Act in respect of Company’s products/services and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. However, we have not made a detailed examination of the cost records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(vii)(a) Undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees’ state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess and other material statutory dues, as applicable, have generally been regularly deposited to the appropriate authorities, though there has been a slight delay in a few cases. Further, no undisputed amounts payable in respect thereof were outstanding at the year-end for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) The dues outstanding in respect of income-tax, sales-tax, service-tax, duty of customs, duty of excise and value added tax on account of any dispute, are as follows:

Statement of Disputed Dues

Name of the statute

Nature of dues

Amount (Rs. in Lakhs)

Amount paid under Protest (‘in lakhs)

Period to which the amount relates

Forum where dispute is pending

Remarks, if any

Various Sales Tax Acts

Central Sales Tax

64.88

-

2000-01

The Andhra Pradesh Sales Tax and VAT Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad

-

2.20

-

2004-05

Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Range-II, Cuttack.

-

Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax

79.36

-

2003-04

Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Warangal

-

Customs Act, 1962

Customs duty

206.06

-

2012-13

CESTAT, Chennai

-

17.62

-

1985-87

Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the combined states of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh

-

Central Excise Act, 1944

Excise duty

737.00

-

2012-13

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore

-

55.29

-

1997-98

CESTAT, New Delhi

-

94.35

-

2011-16

Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise (Appeals), Hyderabad

-

136.90

-

2000-01 to 2001-02

Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the combined states of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh

-

12.61

-

2000-01 to 2005-06

Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Visakhapatnam

-

Finance Act, 1994 (as amended

Service Tax

124.55

-

2009-14

Commissioner of Service Tax (Appeals), Hyderabad

-

17.05

-

2014-15

Commissioner of Service Tax (Appeals), Hyderabad

-

474.74

-

2007-08

CESTAT, Kolkata

-

14.65

-

April 2012 to March 2014

Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Kakinada

-

22.72

-

April 2011 to March 2017

Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Kakinada

-

60.76

-

October 2007 to March 2017

Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Visakhapatnam

-

Income Tax Act, 1961

Income tax

311.60

311.60

AY 2005-06

Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the combined states of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh

-

325.24

325.24

AY 2008-09

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

-

61.62

61.62

AY 2009-10

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

-

53.32

53.32

AY 2009-10

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)

-

66.19

66.19

AY 2010-11

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)

-

2,078.02

-

AY 2010-11

Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the combined states of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh

-

176.11

176.11

AY 2011-12

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)

-

290.02

290.02

AY 2012-13

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

-

85.19

85.19

AY 2013-14

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

-

(viii) The Company has not defaulted in repayment of loans or borrowings to any banks during the year. The Company did not have any outstanding loans or borrowings from financial institution or government or outstanding debentures during the year.

(ix) The Company did not raise moneys by way of initial public offer or further public offer (including debt instruments). In our opinion, the term loans were applied for the purposes for which the loans were obtained.

(x) No fraud by the Company or on the company by its officers or employees has been noticed or reported during the period covered by our audit.

(xi) Managerial remuneration has been paid (and)/provided by the company in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of Section 197 of the Act read with Schedule V to the Act.

(xii) In our opinion, the Company is not a Nidhi Company. Accordingly, provisions of clause 3(xii) of the Order are not applicable.

(xiii) In our opinion all transactions with the related parties are in compliance with Sections 177 and 188 of Act, where applicable, and the requisite details have been disclosed in the financial statements etc., as required by the applicable Ind AS.

(xiv) During the year, the Company has not made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures.

(xv) In our opinion, the Company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with the directors or persons connected with them covered under Section 192 of the Act.

(xvi) The Company is not required to be registered under Section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.

Annexure II to the Independent Auditor’s Report of even date to the members of Nava Bharat Ventures Limited on the standalone financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2018

Annexure II

Independent Auditor’s Report on the Internal Financial Controls under Clause (i) of Sub-section 3 of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 (‘the Act’)

1. In conjunction with our audit of the standalone financial statements of Nava Bharat Ventures Limited (‘the Company’) as at and for the year ended 31 March 2018, we have audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting (‘IFCoFR’) of the Company as at that date.

Management’s Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls

2. The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (‘ICAI ‘). These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of the Company’s business, including adherence to the Company’s policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Act.

Auditor’s Responsibility

3. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s IFCoFR based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (‘ICAI’) and deemed to be prescribed under Section 143(10) of the Act, to the extent applicable to an audit of IFCoFR, and the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting (‘the Guidance Note’) issued by the ICAI. Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate IFCoFR were established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.

4. Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the IFCoFR and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of IFCoFR includes obtaining an understanding of IFCoFR, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.

5. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Company’s IFCoFR.

Meaning of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

6. A Company’s IFCoFR is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s IFCoFR include those policies and procedures that

(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;

(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorisations of management and directors of the company; and

(3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

7. Because of the inherent limitations of IFCoFR, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the IFCoFR to future periods are subject to the risk that the IFCoFR may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Opinion

8. In our opinion, the Company has, in all material respects, adequate internal financial controls over financial reporting and such controls were operating effectively as at 31 March 2018, based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (‘ICAI’).

For Walker Chandiok & Co LLP

Chartered Accountants

Firm’s Registration No.: 001076N/N500013

per Sanjay Kumar Jain

Place: Hyderabad Partner

Date : May 30, 2018 Membership No.: 207660